Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[SimplifyCFG] Defer folding unconditional branches to LateSimplifyCFG…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
… if it can destroy canonical loop structure.

Summary:
When simplifying unconditional branches from empty blocks, we pre-test if the
BB belongs to a set of loop headers and keep the block to prevent passes from
destroying canonical loop structure. However, the current algorithm fails if
the destination of the branch is a loop header. Especially when such a loop's
latch block is folded into loop header it results in additional backedges and
LoopSimplify turns it into a nested loop which prevent later optimizations
from being applied (e.g., loop  unrolling and loop interleaving).

This patch augments the existing algorithm by further checking if the
destination of the branch belongs to a set of loop headers and defer
eliminating it if yes to LateSimplifyCFG.

Fixes PR33605: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33605

Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, pacxx, hsung, davidxl

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: ashutosh.nema, gberry, javed.absar, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35411

llvm-svn: 308422
  • Loading branch information
Balaram Makam committed Jul 19, 2017
1 parent 8c452d7 commit b05a557
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 14 changed files with 166 additions and 30 deletions.
10 changes: 6 additions & 4 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
Expand Up @@ -231,13 +231,15 @@ bool JumpThreadingPass::runImpl(Function &F, TargetLibraryInfo *TLI_,
// Can't thread an unconditional jump, but if the block is "almost
// empty", we can replace uses of it with uses of the successor and make
// this dead.
// We should not eliminate the loop header either, because eliminating
// a loop header might later prevent LoopSimplify from transforming nested
// loops into simplified form.
// We should not eliminate the loop header or latch either, because
// eliminating a loop header or latch might later prevent LoopSimplify
// from transforming nested loops into simplified form. We will rely on
// later passes in backend to clean up empty blocks.
if (BI && BI->isUnconditional() &&
BB != &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock() &&
// If the terminator is the only non-phi instruction, try to nuke it.
BB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbg()->isTerminator() && !LoopHeaders.count(BB)) {
BB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbg()->isTerminator() && !LoopHeaders.count(BB) &&
!LoopHeaders.count(BI->getSuccessor(0))) {
// FIXME: It is always conservatively correct to drop the info
// for a block even if it doesn't get erased. This isn't totally
// awesome, but it allows us to use AssertingVH to prevent nasty
Expand Down
16 changes: 9 additions & 7 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
Expand Up @@ -5656,20 +5656,22 @@ static bool TryToMergeLandingPad(LandingPadInst *LPad, BranchInst *BI,
bool SimplifyCFGOpt::SimplifyUncondBranch(BranchInst *BI,
IRBuilder<> &Builder) {
BasicBlock *BB = BI->getParent();
BasicBlock *Succ = BI->getSuccessor(0);

if (SinkCommon && SinkThenElseCodeToEnd(BI))
return true;

// If the Terminator is the only non-phi instruction, simplify the block.
// if LoopHeader is provided, check if the block is a loop header
// (This is for early invocations before loop simplify and vectorization
// to keep canonical loop forms for nested loops.
// These blocks can be eliminated when the pass is invoked later
// in the back-end.)
// if LoopHeader is provided, check if the block or its successor is a loop
// header (This is for early invocations before loop simplify and
// vectorization to keep canonical loop forms for nested loops. These blocks
// can be eliminated when the pass is invoked later in the back-end.)
bool NeedCanonicalLoop =
!LateSimplifyCFG &&
(LoopHeaders && (LoopHeaders->count(BB) || LoopHeaders->count(Succ)));
BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbg()->getIterator();
if (I->isTerminator() && BB != &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock() &&
(!LoopHeaders || !LoopHeaders->count(BB)) &&
TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock(BB))
!NeedCanonicalLoop && TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock(BB))
return true;

// If the only instruction in the block is a seteq/setne comparison
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/aarch64-loop-gep-opt.ll
Expand Up @@ -19,9 +19,9 @@ entry:

do.body.i:
; CHECK-LABEL: do.body.i:
; CHECK: %uglygep2 = getelementptr i8, i8* %uglygep, i64 %3
; CHECK-NEXT: %4 = bitcast i8* %uglygep2 to i32*
; CHECK-NOT: %uglygep2 = getelementptr i8, i8* %uglygep, i64 1032
; CHECK: %uglygep1 = getelementptr i8, i8* %uglygep, i64 %3
; CHECK-NEXT: %4 = bitcast i8* %uglygep1 to i32*
; CHECK-NOT: %uglygep1 = getelementptr i8, i8* %uglygep, i64 1032


%0 = phi i32 [ 256, %entry ], [ %.be, %do.body.i.backedge ]
Expand Down
64 changes: 64 additions & 0 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/pr33605.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -jump-threading -S | FileCheck %s

; Skip simplifying unconditional branches from empty blocks in simplifyCFG,
; when it can destroy canonical loop structure.

; void foo();
; bool test(int a, int b, int *c) {
; bool changed = false;
; for (unsigned int i = 2; i--;) {
; int r = a | b;
; if ( r != c[i]) {
; c[i] = r;
; foo();
; changed = true;
; }
; }
; return changed;
; }

; CHECK-LABEL: @test(
; CHECK: for.cond:
; CHECK-NEXT: %i.0 = phi i32 [ 2, %entry ], [ %dec, %if.end ]
; CHECK: for.body:
; CHECK: br i1 %cmp, label %if.end, label %if.then
; CHECK-NOT: br i1 %cmp, label %for.cond, label %if.then
; CHECK: if.then:
; CHECK: br label %if.end
; CHECK-NOT: br label %for.cond
; CHECK: if.end:
; CHECK br label %for.cond
define i1 @test(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32* %c) {
entry:
br label %for.cond

for.cond: ; preds = %if.end, %entry
%i.0 = phi i32 [ 2, %entry ], [ %dec, %if.end ]
%changed.0.off0 = phi i1 [ false, %entry ], [ %changed.1.off0, %if.end ]
%dec = add nsw i32 %i.0, -1
%tobool = icmp eq i32 %i.0, 0
br i1 %tobool, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body

for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.cond
%changed.0.off0.lcssa = phi i1 [ %changed.0.off0, %for.cond ]
ret i1 %changed.0.off0.lcssa

for.body: ; preds = %for.cond
%or = or i32 %a, %b
%idxprom = sext i32 %dec to i64
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %c, i64 %idxprom
%0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %or, %0
br i1 %cmp, label %if.end, label %if.then

if.then: ; preds = %for.body
store i32 %or, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
call void @foo()
br label %if.end

if.end: ; preds = %for.body, %if.then
%changed.1.off0 = phi i1 [ true, %if.then ], [ %changed.0.off0, %for.body ]
br label %for.cond
}

declare void @foo()
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/static-profile.ll
Expand Up @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ eq_1:
; Verify the new backedge:
; CHECK: check_2.thread:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @bar()
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %check_1
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %check_3.thread

check_2:
%cond2 = icmp eq i32 %v, 2
Expand All @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ eq_2:
; Verify the new backedge:
; CHECK: eq_2:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @bar()
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %check_1
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %check_3.thread

check_3:
%condE = icmp eq i32 %v, 3
Expand Down
12 changes: 8 additions & 4 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop.ll
Expand Up @@ -18,9 +18,11 @@
; CHECK: %[[INC2:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %p, i64 2
; CHECK: store i32 2, i32* %[[INC2]], align 4
; CHECK: %[[CMP3:.*]] = icmp eq i32 %k, 3
; CHECK: br i1 %[[CMP3]], label %for.end, label %[[LOOP:.*]]
; CHECK: br i1 %[[CMP3]], label %for.end, label %[[LOOP_PH:.*]]
; CHECK: [[LOOP_PH]]:
; CHECK: br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
; CHECK: [[LOOP]]:
; CHECK: %[[IV:.*]] = phi i32 [ {{.*}}, %[[LOOP]] ], [ 3, %[[NEXT2]] ]
; CHECK: %[[IV:.*]] = phi i32 [ 3, %[[LOOP_PH]] ], [ {{.*}}, %[[LOOP]] ]

define void @basic(i32* %p, i32 %k) #0 {
entry:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -65,9 +67,11 @@ for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_cr
; CHECK: %[[INC2:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %p, i64 2
; CHECK: store i32 2, i32* %[[INC2]], align 4
; CHECK: %[[CMP3:.*]] = icmp eq i32 %k, 3
; CHECK: br i1 %[[CMP3]], label %for.end, label %[[LOOP:.*]]
; CHECK: br i1 %[[CMP3]], label %for.end, label %[[LOOP_PH:.*]]
; CHECK: [[LOOP_PH]]:
; CHECK: br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
; CHECK: [[LOOP]]:
; CHECK: %[[IV:.*]] = phi i32 [ %[[IV:.*]], %[[LOOP]] ], [ 3, %[[NEXT2]] ]
; CHECK: %[[IV:.*]] = phi i32 [ 3, %[[LOOP_PH]] ], [ %[[IV:.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
; CHECK: %ret = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ 1, %[[NEXT0]] ], [ 2, %[[NEXT1]] ], [ 3, %[[NEXT2]] ], [ %[[IV]], %[[LOOP]] ]
; CHECK: ret i32 %ret
define i32 @output(i32* %p, i32 %k) #0 {
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/2015-06-17-Metadata.ll
Expand Up @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ for.body: ; preds = %for.inc, %for.body.
%cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %a, 12345
br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then, label %if.else, !prof !0
; CHECK: %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 %a, 12345
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cmp1, label %for.body.us, label %for.body, !prof !0
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cmp1, label %for.body.preheader.split.us, label %for.body.preheader.split, !prof !0
if.then: ; preds = %for.body
; CHECK: for.body.us:
; CHECK: add nsw i32 %{{.*}}, 123
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ entry:
br label %for.body
;CHECK: entry:
;CHECK-NEXT: %cmp1 = icmp eq i32 1, 2
;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cmp1, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup.split, !prof !1
;CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cmp1, label %entry.split, label %for.cond.cleanup.split, !prof !1
;CHECK: for.body:
for.body: ; preds = %for.inc, %entry
%inc.i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %if.then ]
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/infinite-loop.ll
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
; Loop unswitching shouldn't trivially unswitch the true case of condition %a
; in the code here because it leads to an infinite loop. While this doesn't
; contain any instructions with side effects, it's still a kind of side effect.
; It can trivially unswitch on the false cas of condition %a though.
; It can trivially unswitch on the false case of condition %a though.

; STATS: 2 loop-unswitch - Number of branches unswitched
; STATS: 2 loop-unswitch - Number of unswitches that are trivial
Expand All @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %a, label %entry.split, label %abort0.split

; CHECK: entry.split:
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %b, label %for.body, label %abort1.split
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %b, label %entry.split.split, label %abort1.split

; CHECK: for.body:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %for.body
Expand Down
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -O3 -mcpu=core-avx2 -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -S | FileCheck --check-prefix AUTO_VEC %s
; RUN: opt < %s -O3 -latesimplifycfg -mcpu=core-avx2 -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -S | FileCheck --check-prefix AUTO_VEC %s

; This test checks auto-vectorization with FP induction variable.
; The FP operation is not "fast" and requires "fast-math" function attribute.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/float-induction.ll
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-vectorize -force-vector-interleave=1 -force-vector-width=4 -dce -instcombine -S | FileCheck --check-prefix VEC4_INTERL1 %s
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-vectorize -force-vector-interleave=2 -force-vector-width=4 -dce -instcombine -S | FileCheck --check-prefix VEC4_INTERL2 %s
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-vectorize -force-vector-interleave=2 -force-vector-width=1 -dce -instcombine -S | FileCheck --check-prefix VEC1_INTERL2 %s
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-vectorize -force-vector-interleave=1 -force-vector-width=2 -dce -simplifycfg -instcombine -S | FileCheck --check-prefix VEC2_INTERL1_PRED_STORE %s
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-vectorize -force-vector-interleave=1 -force-vector-width=2 -dce -simplifycfg -instcombine -latesimplifycfg -S | FileCheck --check-prefix VEC2_INTERL1_PRED_STORE %s

@fp_inc = common global float 0.000000e+00, align 4

Expand Down
Expand Up @@ -1322,8 +1322,8 @@ l6:
; Speculation depth must be limited to avoid a zero-cost instruction cycle.

; CHECK-LABEL: @PR26308(
; CHECK: while.body:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %while.body
; CHECK: cleanup4:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %cleanup4

define i32 @PR26308(i1 %B, i64 %load) {
entry:
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/multiple-phis.ll
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -simplifycfg -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -latesimplifycfg -S < %s | FileCheck %s

; It's not worthwhile to if-convert one of the phi nodes and leave
; the other behind, because that still requires a branch. If
Expand Down
64 changes: 64 additions & 0 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/pr33605.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -simplifycfg -S | FileCheck %s

; Skip simplifying unconditional branches from empty blocks in simplifyCFG,
; when it can destroy canonical loop structure.

; void foo();
; bool test(int a, int b, int *c) {
; bool changed = false;
; for (unsigned int i = 2; i--;) {
; int r = a | b;
; if ( r != c[i]) {
; c[i] = r;
; foo();
; changed = true;
; }
; }
; return changed;
; }

; CHECK-LABEL: @test(
; CHECK: for.cond:
; CHECK-NEXT: %i.0 = phi i32 [ 2, %entry ], [ %dec, %if.end ]
; CHECK: for.body:
; CHECK: br i1 %cmp, label %if.end, label %if.then
; CHECK-NOT: br i1 %cmp, label %for.cond, label %if.then
; CHECK: if.then:
; CHECK: br label %if.end
; CHECK-NOT: br label %for.cond
; CHECK: if.end:
; CHECK br label %for.cond
define i1 @test(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32* %c) {
entry:
br label %for.cond

for.cond: ; preds = %if.end, %entry
%i.0 = phi i32 [ 2, %entry ], [ %dec, %if.end ]
%changed.0.off0 = phi i1 [ false, %entry ], [ %changed.1.off0, %if.end ]
%dec = add nsw i32 %i.0, -1
%tobool = icmp eq i32 %i.0, 0
br i1 %tobool, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body

for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.cond
%changed.0.off0.lcssa = phi i1 [ %changed.0.off0, %for.cond ]
ret i1 %changed.0.off0.lcssa

for.body: ; preds = %for.cond
%or = or i32 %a, %b
%idxprom = sext i32 %dec to i64
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %c, i64 %idxprom
%0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %or, %0
br i1 %cmp, label %if.end, label %if.then

if.then: ; preds = %for.body
store i32 %or, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
call void @foo()
br label %if.end

if.end: ; preds = %for.body, %if.then
%changed.1.off0 = phi i1 [ true, %if.then ], [ %changed.0.off0, %for.body ]
br label %for.cond
}

declare void @foo()
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt -simplifycfg -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt -latesimplifycfg -S < %s | FileCheck %s

define void @test1(i32 %n) #0 {
entry:
Expand Down

0 comments on commit b05a557

Please sign in to comment.