Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[LoopInterchange] Incrementally update the dominator tree.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
We can use incremental dominator tree updates to avoid re-calculating
the dominator tree after interchanging 2 loops.

Reviewers: dmgreen, kuhar

Reviewed By: kuhar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43176

llvm-svn: 325122
  • Loading branch information
fhahn committed Feb 14, 2018
1 parent af6312a commit c6296fe
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 12 changed files with 51 additions and 45 deletions.
74 changes: 40 additions & 34 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp
Expand Up @@ -453,6 +453,8 @@ struct LoopInterchange : public FunctionPass {
AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);
AU.addRequiredID(LCSSAID);
AU.addRequired<OptimizationRemarkEmitterWrapperPass>();

AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
}

bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override {
Expand All @@ -462,8 +464,7 @@ struct LoopInterchange : public FunctionPass {
SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE();
LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo();
DI = &getAnalysis<DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass>().getDI();
auto *DTWP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
DT = DTWP ? &DTWP->getDomTree() : nullptr;
DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
ORE = &getAnalysis<OptimizationRemarkEmitterWrapperPass>().getORE();
PreserveLCSSA = mustPreserveAnalysisID(LCSSAID);

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -573,7 +574,6 @@ struct LoopInterchange : public FunctionPass {

// Update the DependencyMatrix
interChangeDependencies(DependencyMatrix, i, i - 1);
DT->recalculate(F);
#ifdef DUMP_DEP_MATRICIES
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Dependence after interchange\n");
printDepMatrix(DependencyMatrix);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1265,8 +1265,31 @@ void LoopInterchangeTransform::updateIncomingBlock(BasicBlock *CurrBlock,
}
}

/// \brief Update BI to jump to NewBB instead of OldBB. Records updates to
/// the dominator tree in DTUpdates, if DT should be preserved.
static void updateSuccessor(BranchInst *BI, BasicBlock *OldBB,
BasicBlock *NewBB,
std::vector<DominatorTree::UpdateType> &DTUpdates) {
assert(llvm::count_if(BI->successors(),
[OldBB](BasicBlock *BB) { return BB == OldBB; }) < 2 &&
"BI must jump to OldBB at most once.");
for (unsigned i = 0, e = BI->getNumSuccessors(); i < e; ++i) {
if (BI->getSuccessor(i) == OldBB) {
BI->setSuccessor(i, NewBB);

DTUpdates.push_back(
{DominatorTree::UpdateKind::Insert, BI->getParent(), NewBB});
DTUpdates.push_back(
{DominatorTree::UpdateKind::Delete, BI->getParent(), OldBB});
break;
}
}
}

bool LoopInterchangeTransform::adjustLoopBranches() {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "adjustLoopBranches called\n");
std::vector<DominatorTree::UpdateType> DTUpdates;

// Adjust the loop preheader
BasicBlock *InnerLoopHeader = InnerLoop->getHeader();
BasicBlock *OuterLoopHeader = OuterLoop->getHeader();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1306,39 +1329,27 @@ bool LoopInterchangeTransform::adjustLoopBranches() {
return false;

// Adjust Loop Preheader and headers

unsigned NumSucc = OuterLoopPredecessorBI->getNumSuccessors();
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumSucc; ++i) {
if (OuterLoopPredecessorBI->getSuccessor(i) == OuterLoopPreHeader)
OuterLoopPredecessorBI->setSuccessor(i, InnerLoopPreHeader);
}

NumSucc = OuterLoopHeaderBI->getNumSuccessors();
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumSucc; ++i) {
if (OuterLoopHeaderBI->getSuccessor(i) == OuterLoopLatch)
OuterLoopHeaderBI->setSuccessor(i, LoopExit);
else if (OuterLoopHeaderBI->getSuccessor(i) == InnerLoopPreHeader)
OuterLoopHeaderBI->setSuccessor(i, InnerLoopHeaderSuccessor);
}
updateSuccessor(OuterLoopPredecessorBI, OuterLoopPreHeader,
InnerLoopPreHeader, DTUpdates);
updateSuccessor(OuterLoopHeaderBI, OuterLoopLatch, LoopExit, DTUpdates);
updateSuccessor(OuterLoopHeaderBI, InnerLoopPreHeader,
InnerLoopHeaderSuccessor, DTUpdates);

// Adjust reduction PHI's now that the incoming block has changed.
updateIncomingBlock(InnerLoopHeaderSuccessor, InnerLoopHeader,
OuterLoopHeader);

BranchInst::Create(OuterLoopPreHeader, InnerLoopHeaderBI);
InnerLoopHeaderBI->eraseFromParent();
updateSuccessor(InnerLoopHeaderBI, InnerLoopHeaderSuccessor,
OuterLoopPreHeader, DTUpdates);

// -------------Adjust loop latches-----------
if (InnerLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(0) == InnerLoopHeader)
InnerLoopLatchSuccessor = InnerLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(1);
else
InnerLoopLatchSuccessor = InnerLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(0);

NumSucc = InnerLoopLatchPredecessorBI->getNumSuccessors();
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumSucc; ++i) {
if (InnerLoopLatchPredecessorBI->getSuccessor(i) == InnerLoopLatch)
InnerLoopLatchPredecessorBI->setSuccessor(i, InnerLoopLatchSuccessor);
}
updateSuccessor(InnerLoopLatchPredecessorBI, InnerLoopLatch,
InnerLoopLatchSuccessor, DTUpdates);

// Adjust PHI nodes in InnerLoopLatchSuccessor. Update all uses of PHI with
// the value and remove this PHI node from inner loop.
Expand All @@ -1358,19 +1369,14 @@ bool LoopInterchangeTransform::adjustLoopBranches() {
else
OuterLoopLatchSuccessor = OuterLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(0);

if (InnerLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(1) == InnerLoopLatchSuccessor)
InnerLoopLatchBI->setSuccessor(1, OuterLoopLatchSuccessor);
else
InnerLoopLatchBI->setSuccessor(0, OuterLoopLatchSuccessor);
updateSuccessor(InnerLoopLatchBI, InnerLoopLatchSuccessor,
OuterLoopLatchSuccessor, DTUpdates);
updateSuccessor(OuterLoopLatchBI, OuterLoopLatchSuccessor, InnerLoopLatch,
DTUpdates);

updateIncomingBlock(OuterLoopLatchSuccessor, OuterLoopLatch, InnerLoopLatch);

if (OuterLoopLatchBI->getSuccessor(0) == OuterLoopLatchSuccessor) {
OuterLoopLatchBI->setSuccessor(0, InnerLoopLatch);
} else {
OuterLoopLatchBI->setSuccessor(1, InnerLoopLatch);
}

DT->applyUpdates(DTUpdates);
return true;
}

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/call-instructions.ll
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/currentLimitation.ll
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; These are test that fail to interchange due to current limitation. This will go off once we extend the loop interchange pass.

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
Expand Down
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
Expand Down
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s

@A10 = local_unnamed_addr global [3 x [3 x i32]] zeroinitializer, align 16

Expand Down
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
Expand Down
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
Expand Down
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
Expand Down
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/phi-ordering.ll
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; Checks the order of the inner phi nodes does not cause havoc.
;; The inner loop has a reduction into c. The IV is not the first phi.

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/profitability.ll
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test profitability model in these test cases.

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reductions.ll
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s

@A = common global [500 x [500 x i32]] zeroinitializer
@X = common global i32 0
Expand Down

0 comments on commit c6296fe

Please sign in to comment.