[NFC][X86][Costmodel] Actually test +prefer-256-bit in replication-sh…

…uffle-related tests :( While -prefer-256-bit indeed becomes complete with D114314, the real-world (the one with +prefer-256-bit) coverage is lacking. Hilarious.
llvm · Nov 20, 2021 · df70cf5 · df70cf5
1 parent aeba28b
commit df70cf5
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 7 changed files with 4,240 additions and 1,876 deletions.
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/extend.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/extend.ll
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i1.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i1.ll
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i16.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i16.ll
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i32.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i32.ll
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i64.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i64.ll
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i8.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/shuffle-replication-i8.ll
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/trunc.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/trunc.ll