Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[clang][dataflow] Eliminate uses of RecordValue::getChild(). #65329

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

martinboehme
Copy link
Contributor

We want to work towards eliminating the RecordStorageLocation from
RecordValue. These particular uses of RecordValue::getChild() can simply
be replaced with RecordStorageLocation::getChild().

We want to work towards eliminating the `RecordStorageLocation` from
`RecordValue`. These particular uses of `RecordValue::getChild()` can simply
be replaced with `RecordStorageLocation::getChild()`.
@martinboehme martinboehme requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2023 14:13
@github-actions github-actions bot added the clang:dataflow Clang Dataflow Analysis framework - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DataFlowAnalysisIntro.html label Sep 5, 2023
@martinboehme martinboehme merged commit f470c36 into llvm:main Sep 6, 2023
2 checks passed
avillega pushed a commit to avillega/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
…65329)

We want to work towards eliminating the `RecordStorageLocation` from
`RecordValue`. These particular uses of `RecordValue::getChild()` can
simply
be replaced with `RecordStorageLocation::getChild()`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:dataflow Clang Dataflow Analysis framework - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DataFlowAnalysisIntro.html
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants