[RecursiveASTVisitor] Fix RecursiveASTVisitor (RAV) fails to visit the initializer of a bitfield

[xgupta]

The problem was introduced in commit 6b8e3c0 when the possibility of initialized bitfields was added, but the logic in RecursiveASTVisitor was not updated.

This fixes #64916.

Patch by Scott McPeak

[llvmbot]

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Shivam Gupta (xgupta)

Changes

This fixes #64916.

Patch by Scott McPeak

---

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69557.diff

3 Files Affected:

• (modified) clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h (+1-1)
• (modified) clang/unittests/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt (+1)
• (added) clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp (+34)

diff --git a/clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h b/clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h
index 3dd23eb38eeabfc..53bc15e1b19f668 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h
@@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ DEF_TRAVERSE_DECL(FieldDecl, {
   TRY_TO(TraverseDeclaratorHelper(D));
   if (D->isBitField())
     TRY_TO(TraverseStmt(D->getBitWidth()));
-  else if (D->hasInClassInitializer())
+  if (D->hasInClassInitializer())
     TRY_TO(TraverseStmt(D->getInClassInitializer()));
 })
 
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt b/clang/unittests/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt
index 2fbe78e3fab7528..5a10a6b285390e9 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/clang/unittests/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ add_clang_unittest(ToolingTests
   QualTypeNamesTest.cpp
   RangeSelectorTest.cpp
   RecursiveASTVisitorTests/Attr.cpp
+  RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp
   RecursiveASTVisitorTests/CallbacksLeaf.cpp
   RecursiveASTVisitorTests/CallbacksUnaryOperator.cpp
   RecursiveASTVisitorTests/CallbacksBinaryOperator.cpp
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp b/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..676a491a43040ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+//===- unittest/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/BitfieldInitializer.cpp -===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "TestVisitor.h"
+#include <string>
+
+using namespace clang;
+
+namespace {
+
+// Check to ensure that bitfield initializers are visited.
+class BitfieldInitializerVisitor : public ExpectedLocationVisitor<BitfieldInitializerVisitor> {
+public:
+  bool VisitIntegerLiteral(IntegerLiteral *IL) {
+    Match(std::to_string(IL->getValue().getSExtValue()), IL->getLocation());
+    return true;
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, BitfieldInitializerIsVisited) {
+  BitfieldInitializerVisitor Visitor;
+  Visitor.ExpectMatch("123", 2, 15); 
+  EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+    "struct S {\n"
+    "  int x : 8 = 123;\n"
+    "};\n"));
+}
+
+} // end anonymous namespace

[github-actions]

✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter.

[cor3ntin]

Can you add a release note for this change? It looks good otherwise

[cor3ntin]

I am not sure what happened here. It probably needs a rebase.

[cor3ntin]

LGTM, thanks!

[xgupta]

Thanks @cor3ntin for the review!