[clang-tidy] Added new check to detect redundant inline keyword #73069
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
felix642
changed the title
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Félix-Antoine Constantin (felix642) ChangesThis checks find usages of the inline keywork where it is already implicitly defined by the compiler and suggests it's removal. Fixes #72397 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73069.diff 9 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/CMakeLists.txt b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/CMakeLists.txt
index 5452c2d48a46173..811310db8c721a6 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ add_clang_library(clangTidyReadabilityModule
IdentifierLengthCheck.cpp
IdentifierNamingCheck.cpp
ImplicitBoolConversionCheck.cpp
+ RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
InconsistentDeclarationParameterNameCheck.cpp
IsolateDeclarationCheck.cpp
MagicNumbersCheck.cpp
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/ReadabilityTidyModule.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/ReadabilityTidyModule.cpp
index b8e6e6414320600..3ce7bfecaecba64 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/ReadabilityTidyModule.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/ReadabilityTidyModule.cpp
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include "RedundantControlFlowCheck.h"
#include "RedundantDeclarationCheck.h"
#include "RedundantFunctionPtrDereferenceCheck.h"
+#include "RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.h"
#include "RedundantMemberInitCheck.h"
#include "RedundantPreprocessorCheck.h"
#include "RedundantSmartptrGetCheck.h"
@@ -93,6 +94,8 @@ class ReadabilityModule : public ClangTidyModule {
"readability-identifier-naming");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<ImplicitBoolConversionCheck>(
"readability-implicit-bool-conversion");
+ CheckFactories.registerCheck<RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck>(
+ "readability-redundant-inline-specifier");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<InconsistentDeclarationParameterNameCheck>(
"readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name");
CheckFactories.registerCheck<IsolateDeclarationCheck>(
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..7b67a7419c708b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+//===--- RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp - clang-tidy----------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
+#include "clang/AST/DeclCXX.h"
+#include "clang/AST/DeclTemplate.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ExprCXX.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/Diagnostic.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/SourceManager.h"
+
+#include "../utils/LexerUtils.h"
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::readability {
+
+static std::optional<SourceLocation>
+getInlineTokenLocation(SourceRange RangeLocation,
+ const SourceManager &Sources,
+ const LangOptions &LangOpts) {
+ SourceLocation CurrentLocation = RangeLocation.getBegin();
+ Token CurrentToken;
+ while (!Lexer::getRawToken(CurrentLocation, CurrentToken, Sources, LangOpts,
+ true) && CurrentLocation < RangeLocation.getEnd() && CurrentToken.isNot(tok::eof)) {
+ if (CurrentToken.is(tok::raw_identifier)) {
+ if (CurrentToken.getRawIdentifier() == "inline") {
+ return CurrentToken.getLocation();
+ }
+ }
+ CurrentLocation = CurrentToken.getEndLoc();
+ }
+ return std::nullopt;
+}
+
+void RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ functionDecl(unless(isExpansionInSystemHeader()), unless(isImplicit()),
+ unless(hasAncestor(lambdaExpr())), isInline(),
+ anyOf(isConstexpr(), isDeleted(),
+ allOf(isDefinition(), hasAncestor(recordDecl()),
+ unless(hasAncestor(cxxConstructorDecl())))))
+ .bind("fun_decl"),
+ this);
+
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ varDecl(isInline(), unless(isImplicit()),
+ anyOf(allOf(isConstexpr(), unless(isStaticStorageClass())),
+ hasAncestor(recordDecl())))
+ .bind("var_decl"),
+ this);
+
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ functionTemplateDecl(has(functionDecl(isInline()))).bind("templ_decl"), this
+ );
+}
+
+template <typename T>
+void RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck::handleMatchedDecl(const T *MatchedDecl, const SourceManager &Sources,
+ const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result,
+ const char *Message) {
+ if (auto Loc = getInlineTokenLocation(MatchedDecl->getSourceRange(),
+ Sources, Result.Context->getLangOpts()))
+ diag(*Loc, Message) << MatchedDecl << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(*Loc);
+}
+
+void RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck::check(
+ const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
+ const SourceManager &Sources = *Result.SourceManager;
+
+ if (const auto *MatchedDecl =
+ Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<FunctionDecl>("fun_decl")) {
+ handleMatchedDecl(MatchedDecl, Sources, Result,
+ "Function %0 has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined");
+ } else if (const auto *MatchedDecl =
+ Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<VarDecl>("var_decl")) {
+ handleMatchedDecl(MatchedDecl, Sources, Result,
+ "Variable %0 has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined");
+ } else if (const auto *MatchedDecl =
+ Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<FunctionTemplateDecl>("templ_decl")) {
+ handleMatchedDecl(MatchedDecl, Sources, Result,
+ "Function %0 has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined");
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace clang::tidy::readability
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.h b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..342e56044a42b1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.h
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+//===--- RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------*-C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_READABILITY_REDUNDANTINLINESPECIFIERCHECK_H
+#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_READABILITY_REDUNDANTINLINESPECIFIERCHECK_H
+
+#include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
+
+namespace clang::tidy::readability {
+
+/// Finds redundant `inline` specifiers in function and variable declarations.
+///
+/// For the user-facing documentation see:
+/// http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability/readability-redundant-inline-specifier.html
+class RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
+public:
+ RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck(StringRef Name, ClangTidyContext *Context)
+ : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) {}
+ void registerMatchers(ast_matchers::MatchFinder *Finder) override;
+ void check(const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) override;
+
+private:
+template <typename T>
+void handleMatchedDecl(const T *MatchedDecl, const SourceManager &Sources,
+ const ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result,
+ const char *Message);
+};
+
+} // namespace clang::tidy::readability
+
+#endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_READABILITY_REDUNDANTINLINESPECIFIERCHECK_H
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index f49c412118e7d98..2b09f4fd8a0f65c 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -192,6 +192,11 @@ New checks
Recommends the smallest possible underlying type for an ``enum`` or ``enum``
class based on the range of its enumerators.
+- New :doc:`readability-redundant-inline-specifier
+ <clang-tidy/checks/readability/readability-redundant-inline-specifier>` check.
+
+ Detects redundant ``inline`` specifiers on function and variable declarations.
+
- New :doc:`readability-reference-to-constructed-temporary
<clang-tidy/checks/readability/reference-to-constructed-temporary>` check.
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
index 6f987ba1672e3f2..b95d8ed64fa180d 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst
@@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ Clang-Tidy Checks
:doc:`readability-identifier-length <readability/identifier-length>`,
:doc:`readability-identifier-naming <readability/identifier-naming>`, "Yes"
:doc:`readability-implicit-bool-conversion <readability/implicit-bool-conversion>`, "Yes"
+ :doc:`readability-redundant-inline-specifier <readability/readability-redundant-inline-specifier>`, "Yes"
:doc:`readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name <readability/inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name>`, "Yes"
:doc:`readability-isolate-declaration <readability/isolate-declaration>`, "Yes"
:doc:`readability-magic-numbers <readability/magic-numbers>`,
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.rst b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..a066f137e0a71c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-redundant-inline-specifier
+
+readability-redundant-inline-specifier
+=================
+
+Checks for instances of the `inline` keyword in code where it is redundant
+and recommends its removal.
+
+Examples:
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+
+ constexpr inline void f() {}
+
+In the example abvove the keyword `inline` is redundant since constexpr
+functions are implicitly inlined
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+ class MyClass {
+ inline void myMethod() {}
+ };
+
+In the example above the keyword `inline` is redundant since member functions
+defined entirely inside a class/struct/union definition are implicitly inlined.
+
+The token `inline` is considered redundant in the following cases:
+
+- When it is used in a function definition that is constexpr.
+- When it is used in a member function definition that is defined entirely
+ inside a class/struct/union definition.
+- When it is used on a deleted function.
+- When it is used on a template declaration.
+- When it is used on a member variable that is constexpr and static.
+
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..b9b143bee46f2a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-redundant-inline-specifier %t
+
+template <typename T> inline T f()
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:23: warning: Function 'f' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+// CHECK-FIXES: template <typename T> T f()
+{
+ return T{};
+}
+
+template <> inline double f<double>() = delete;
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:13: warning: Function 'f<double>' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+// CHECK-FIXES: template <> double f<double>() = delete;
+
+inline int g(float a)
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: warning: Function 'g' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+{
+ return static_cast<int>(a - 5.F);
+}
+
+inline int g(double) = delete;
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: warning: Function 'g' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+// CHECK-FIXES: int g(double) = delete;
+
+class C
+{
+ public:
+ inline C& operator=(const C&) = delete;
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: Function 'operator=' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ // CHECK-FIXES: C& operator=(const C&) = delete;
+
+ constexpr inline C& operator=(int a);
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: Function 'operator=' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ // CHECK-FIXES: constexpr C& operator=(int a);
+
+ inline C() {}
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: Function 'C' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ // CHECK-FIXES: C() {}
+
+ constexpr inline C(int);
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: Function 'C' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ // CHECK-FIXES: constexpr C(int);
+
+ inline int Get42() const { return 42; }
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: Function 'Get42' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ // CHECK-FIXES: int Get42() const { return 42; }
+
+ static inline constexpr int C_STATIC = 42;
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:12: warning: Variable 'C_STATIC' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ // CHECK-FIXES: static constexpr int C_STATIC = 42;
+
+ static constexpr int C_STATIC_2 = 42;
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: Variable 'C_STATIC_2' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+};
+
+constexpr inline int Get42() { return 42; }
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:11: warning: Function 'Get42' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+// CHECK-FIXES: constexpr int Get42() { return 42; }
+
+
+static constexpr inline int NAMESPACE_STATIC = 42;
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE-1]]:18: warning: Variable 'NAMESPACE_STATIC' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+
+inline static int fn0(int i)
+// CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: warning: Function 'fn0' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+{
+ return i - 1;
+}
+
+static constexpr inline int fn1(int i)
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:18: warning: Function 'fn1' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+// CHECK-FIXES: static constexpr int fn1(int i)
+{
+ return i - 1;
+}
+
+namespace
+{
+ inline int fn2(int i)
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: Function 'fn2' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ {
+ return i - 1;
+ }
+
+ inline constexpr int fn3(int i)
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: Function 'fn3' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ // CHECK-FIXES: constexpr int fn3(int i)
+ {
+ return i - 1;
+ }
+}
+
+namespace ns
+{
+ inline int fn4(int i)
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: Function 'fn4' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ {
+ return i - 1;
+ }
+
+ inline constexpr int fn5(int i)
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: Function 'fn5' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+ // CHECK-FIXES: constexpr int fn5(int i)
+ {
+ return i - 1;
+ }
+}
+
+auto fn6 = [](){};
+//CHECK-MESSAGES-NOT: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: warning: Function 'operator()' has inline specifier but is implicitly inlined [readability-redundant-inline-specifier]
+
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h b/clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h
index 82a26356c58f556..06e784649a975bf 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h
@@ -7889,7 +7889,7 @@ AST_POLYMORPHIC_MATCHER(isInline, AST_POLYMORPHIC_SUPPORTED_TYPES(NamespaceDecl,
if (const auto *NSD = dyn_cast<NamespaceDecl>(&Node))
return NSD->isInline();
if (const auto *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(&Node))
- return VD->isInline();
+ return VD->isInlineSpecified();
llvm_unreachable("Not a valid polymorphic type");
}
|
felix642
force-pushed
the
readability-implicit-inline
branch
from
894c3c8
to
89281cc
Compare
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Nov 22, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Nov 22, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Nov 22, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Nov 22, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Nov 22, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Nov 22, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Nov 22, 2023
|
@PiotrZSL could you use the "Start review" button to avoid spamming people with dozens of E-Mails for a single review? |
@philnik777 If you prefer not to receive notifications, simply unsubscribe. Specially if you consider such notifications a "spam". |
It's not that I don't want to receive notifications. I want to receive one E-Mail for one review. I'm also not a fan of receiving dozens of mails for a review on one of my patches, but I still want the notification. A single mail for such a thing isn't spam. Getting eight is. |
bjosv
reviewed
Nov 22, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
EugeneZelenko
requested changes
Nov 22, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
EugeneZelenko
requested changes
Nov 24, 2023
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Nov 24, 2023
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.cpp
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
reviewed
Dec 9, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code looks fine (except comments), main concern is if this isn't to strict, simply if someone remove some of those inline keywords, won't it decrease performance of code.
Please add verification, to ignore any functions with attributes, mainly always_inline, never_inline but to simplify all could be ignored.
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/readability/redundant-inline-specifier.cpp
Show resolved
Hide resolved
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantInlineSpecifierCheck.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PiotrZSL
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2024
|
ping @EugeneZelenko |
EugeneZelenko
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2024
This checks find usages of the inline keywork where it is already implicitly defined by the compiler and suggests it's removal. Fixes llvm#72397
felix642
force-pushed
the
readability-implicit-inline
branch
from
3ec09df
to
286c444
Compare
|
I have rebased my branch with main. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This checks find usages of the inline keywork where it is already implicitly defined by the compiler and suggests it's removal.
Fixes #72397