-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[X86][BF16] Add subvec_zero_lowering patterns #76507
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 Author: Phoebe Wang (phoebewang) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76507.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 35e54ebd5129f7..57ada84bbeffad 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -3743,7 +3743,7 @@ static SDValue getZeroVector(MVT VT, const X86Subtarget &Subtarget,
SDValue Vec;
if (!Subtarget.hasSSE2() && VT.is128BitVector()) {
Vec = DAG.getConstantFP(+0.0, dl, MVT::v4f32);
- } else if (VT.isFloatingPoint()) {
+ } else if (VT.isFloatingPoint() && VT.getVectorElementType() != MVT::bf16) {
Vec = DAG.getConstantFP(+0.0, dl, VT);
} else if (VT.getVectorElementType() == MVT::i1) {
assert((Subtarget.hasBWI() || VT.getVectorNumElements() <= 16) &&
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrVecCompiler.td b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrVecCompiler.td
index 70bd77bba03ab3..bbd19cf8d5b25e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrVecCompiler.td
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrVecCompiler.td
@@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ let Predicates = [HasAVX, NoVLX] in {
defm : subvec_zero_lowering<"DQA", VR128, v32i8, v16i8, sub_xmm>;
}
+let Predicates = [HasAVXNECONVERT, NoVLX] in
+ defm : subvec_zero_lowering<"DQA", VR128, v16bf16, v8bf16, sub_xmm>;
+
let Predicates = [HasVLX] in {
defm : subvec_zero_lowering<"APDZ128", VR128X, v4f64, v2f64, sub_xmm>;
defm : subvec_zero_lowering<"APSZ128", VR128X, v8f32, v4f32, sub_xmm>;
@@ -175,6 +178,12 @@ let Predicates = [HasFP16, HasVLX] in {
defm : subvec_zero_lowering<"APSZ256", VR256X, v32f16, v16f16, sub_ymm>;
}
+let Predicates = [HasBF16, HasVLX] in {
+ defm : subvec_zero_lowering<"APSZ128", VR128X, v16bf16, v8bf16, sub_xmm>;
+ defm : subvec_zero_lowering<"APSZ128", VR128X, v32bf16, v8bf16, sub_xmm>;
+ defm : subvec_zero_lowering<"APSZ256", VR256X, v32bf16, v16bf16, sub_ymm>;
+}
+
class maskzeroupper<ValueType vt, RegisterClass RC> :
PatLeaf<(vt RC:$src), [{
return isMaskZeroExtended(N);
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/bfloat.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/bfloat.ll
index 674a0eacb0ca98..9c65310f79d7ec 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/bfloat.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/bfloat.ll
@@ -2529,3 +2529,17 @@ define <8 x bfloat> @extract_v32bf16_v8bf16(<32 x bfloat> %x) {
%a = shufflevector <32 x bfloat> %x, <32 x bfloat> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 8, i32 9, i32 10, i32 11, i32 12, i32 13, i32 14, i32 15>
ret <8 x bfloat> %a
}
+
+define <16 x bfloat> @concat_zero_v8bf16(<8 x bfloat> %x, <8 x bfloat> %y) {
+; SSE2-LABEL: concat_zero_v8bf16:
+; SSE2: # %bb.0:
+; SSE2-NEXT: xorps %xmm1, %xmm1
+; SSE2-NEXT: retq
+;
+; AVX-LABEL: concat_zero_v8bf16:
+; AVX: # %bb.0:
+; AVX-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm0, %xmm0
+; AVX-NEXT: retq
+ %a = shufflevector <8 x bfloat> %x, <8 x bfloat> zeroinitializer, <16 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7, i32 8, i32 9, i32 10, i32 11, i32 12, i32 13, i32 14, i32 15>
+ ret <16 x bfloat> %a
+}
|
@@ -3743,7 +3743,7 @@ static SDValue getZeroVector(MVT VT, const X86Subtarget &Subtarget, | |||
SDValue Vec; | |||
if (!Subtarget.hasSSE2() && VT.is128BitVector()) { | |||
Vec = DAG.getConstantFP(+0.0, dl, MVT::v4f32); | |||
} else if (VT.isFloatingPoint()) { | |||
} else if (VT.isFloatingPoint() && VT.getVectorElementType() != MVT::bf16) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this necessary? Are we missing bf16 handling somewhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because the scalar bf16
is an illegal type even vXbf16
are legal. We worked around it in BUILDVECTOR and should try to avoid build zero vector here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we test for isTypeLegal(VT.getVectorElementType()) instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with one (optional) minor
@@ -3743,7 +3743,7 @@ static SDValue getZeroVector(MVT VT, const X86Subtarget &Subtarget, | |||
SDValue Vec; | |||
if (!Subtarget.hasSSE2() && VT.is128BitVector()) { | |||
Vec = DAG.getConstantFP(+0.0, dl, MVT::v4f32); | |||
} else if (VT.isFloatingPoint()) { | |||
} else if (VT.isFloatingPoint() && VT.getVectorElementType() != MVT::bf16) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we test for isTypeLegal(VT.getVectorElementType()) instead?
…ffd43ea2e Local branch amd-gfx 5aaffd4 Merged main:a1f1371fdc7d9af9edf32339dcfebada96d937a5 into amd-gfx:45668192a2fc Remote branch main a384cd5 [X86][BF16] Add subvec_zero_lowering patterns (llvm#76507)
No description provided.