Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AArch64] MI Scheduler STP combine #80188

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sjoerdmeijer
Copy link
Collaborator

Add opcodes for different store instructions to the target hook that can enable more STP pairs. This is split off from the patch that does the same for some load instructions (#79003).

Patch co-authored by Cameron McInally.

Add opcodes for different store instructions to the target hook that
can enable more STP pairs. This is split off from the patch that does
the same for some load instructions (llvm#79003).

Patch co-authored by Cameron McInally.
@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Jan 31, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64

Author: Sjoerd Meijer (sjoerdmeijer)

Changes

Add opcodes for different store instructions to the target hook that can enable more STP pairs. This is split off from the patch that does the same for some load instructions (#79003).

Patch co-authored by Cameron McInally.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80188.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp (+15)
  • (modified) llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-ldp-cluster.ll (+71-1)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp
index 8e50c16ba0887..6c2feb7af9ca1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp
@@ -4206,6 +4206,21 @@ static bool canPairLdStOpc(unsigned FirstOpc, unsigned SecondOpc) {
   switch (FirstOpc) {
   default:
     return false;
+  case AArch64::STRSui:
+  case AArch64::STURSi:
+    return SecondOpc == AArch64::STRSui || SecondOpc == AArch64::STURSi;
+  case AArch64::STRDui:
+  case AArch64::STURDi:
+    return SecondOpc == AArch64::STRDui || SecondOpc == AArch64::STURDi;
+  case AArch64::STRQui:
+  case AArch64::STURQi:
+    return SecondOpc == AArch64::STRQui || SecondOpc == AArch64::STURQi;
+  case AArch64::STRWui:
+  case AArch64::STURWi:
+    return SecondOpc == AArch64::STRWui || SecondOpc == AArch64::STURWi;
+  case AArch64::STRXui:
+  case AArch64::STURXi:
+    return SecondOpc == AArch64::STRXui || SecondOpc == AArch64::STURXi;
   case AArch64::LDRSui:
   case AArch64::LDURSi:
     return SecondOpc == AArch64::LDRSui || SecondOpc == AArch64::LDURSi;
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-ldp-cluster.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-ldp-cluster.ll
index d1bce2fbfa9f2..8c7b31fd34c48 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-ldp-cluster.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-ldp-cluster.ll
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; REQUIRES: asserts
-; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm64-linux-gnu -mcpu=cortex-a57 -verify-misched -debug-only=machine-scheduler -o - 2>&1 > /dev/null | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm64-linux-gnu -mcpu=cortex-a57 -verify-misched -debug-only=machine-scheduler -o - 2>&1 > /dev/null | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-A57
 ; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=arm64-linux-gnu -mcpu=exynos-m3 -verify-misched -debug-only=machine-scheduler -o - 2>&1 > /dev/null | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Test ldr clustering.
@@ -227,3 +227,73 @@ entry:
   store i64 %r53, ptr %wb
   ret void
 }
+
+; CHECK: ********** MI Scheduling **********
+; CHECK: STURWi_STRWui:%bb.0 entry
+; CHECK: Cluster ld/st SU(3) - SU(4)
+; CHECK: SU(3):   STURWi %{{[0-9]+}}:gpr32
+; CHECK: SU(4):   STRWui %{{[0-9]+}}:gpr32
+;
+define void @STURWi_STRWui(ptr nocapture readonly %arg, i32 %b, i32 %c) {
+entry:
+  %r51 = getelementptr i8, ptr %arg, i64 -4
+  store i32 %b, ptr %r51
+  store i32 %c, ptr %arg
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK: ********** MI Scheduling **********
+; CHECK: STURXi_STRXui:%bb.0 entry
+; CHECK: Cluster ld/st SU(3) - SU(4)
+; CHECK: SU(3):   STURXi %{{[0-9]+}}:gpr64
+; CHECK: SU(4):   STRXui %{{[0-9]+}}:gpr64
+;
+define void @STURXi_STRXui(ptr nocapture readonly %arg, i64 %b, i64 %c) {
+entry:
+  %r51 = getelementptr i8, ptr %arg, i64 -8
+  store i64 %b, ptr %r51
+  store i64 %c, ptr %arg
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-A57: ********** MI Scheduling **********
+; CHECK-A57: STURSi_STRSui:%bb.0 entry
+; CHECK-A57: Cluster ld/st SU(3) - SU(4)
+; CHECK-A57: SU(3):   STURSi %{{[0-9]+}}:fpr32
+; CHECK-A57: SU(4):   STRSui %{{[0-9]+}}:fpr32
+;
+define void @STURSi_STRSui(ptr nocapture readonly %arg, float %b, float %c) {
+entry:
+  %r51 = getelementptr i8, ptr %arg, i64 -4
+  store float %b, ptr %r51
+  store float %c, ptr %arg
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-A57: ********** MI Scheduling **********
+; CHECK-A57: STURDi_STRDui:%bb.0 entry
+; CHECK-A57: Cluster ld/st SU(3) - SU(4)
+; CHECK-A57: SU(3):   STURDi %{{[0-9]+}}:fpr64
+; CHECK-A57: SU(4):   STRDui %{{[0-9]+}}:fpr64
+;
+define void @STURDi_STRDui(ptr nocapture readonly %arg, <2 x float> %b, <2 x float> %c) {
+entry:
+  %r51 = getelementptr i8, ptr %arg, i64 -8
+  store <2 x float> %b, ptr %r51
+  store <2 x float> %c, ptr %arg
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-A57: ********** MI Scheduling **********
+; CHECK-A57: STURQi_STRQui:%bb.0 entry
+; CHECK-A57: Cluster ld/st SU(3) - SU(4)
+; CHECK-A57: SU(3):   STURQi %{{[0-9]+}}:fpr128
+; CHECK-A57: SU(4):   STRQui %{{[0-9]+}}:fpr128
+;
+define void @STURQi_STRQui(ptr nocapture readonly %arg, <2 x double> %b, <2 x double> %c) {
+entry:
+  %r51 = getelementptr i8, ptr %arg, i64 -16
+  store <2 x double> %b, ptr %r51
+  store <2 x double> %c, ptr %arg
+  ret void
+}

Copy link
Collaborator

@davemgreen davemgreen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. These look OK to me. There is a chance they cause problems, we will need to keep an eye out in case anything comes up.

LGTM

@sjoerdmeijer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks, will keep an eye out.

@sjoerdmeijer sjoerdmeijer merged commit 35904ec into llvm:main Feb 6, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@sjoerdmeijer sjoerdmeijer deleted the combine-stp branch February 6, 2024 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants