Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MachineOutliner] Consider Leaf Descendants as Outlining Candidates #88996

Closed

Conversation

xuanzhang816
Copy link
Contributor

In the current implementation, only leaf children of each internal node in the suffix tree are included as candidates for outlining. But all leaf descendants are outlining candidates, which we include in the new implementation.

Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write
permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by
name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review
by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate
is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@xuanzhang816 xuanzhang816 force-pushed the outliner-commit-3-leaf-descendants branch from 8ab0551 to 8e5f746 Compare April 25, 2024 19:55
@xuanzhang816 xuanzhang816 force-pushed the outliner-commit-3-leaf-descendants branch from 8e5f746 to 081bc05 Compare April 25, 2024 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant