Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[test] Add triple in test introduced in #98317 #98600

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

paperchalice
Copy link
Contributor

@paperchalice paperchalice commented Jul 12, 2024

Missing -mtriple in test, causes failure on some none x86 default targets.

@paperchalice paperchalice added the skip-precommit-approval PR for CI feedback, not intended for review label Jul 12, 2024
@llvmbot llvmbot added backend:X86 and removed skip-precommit-approval PR for CI feedback, not intended for review labels Jul 12, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Jul 12, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86

Author: None (paperchalice)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98600.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/machine-block-freq.mir (+1-1)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/machine-block-freq.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/machine-block-freq.mir
index bdfb39ccb09ab..5740f28268e1b 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/machine-block-freq.mir
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/machine-block-freq.mir
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# RUN: llc --passes='print<machine-block-freq>' -filetype=null 2>&1 %s | FileCheck %s
+# RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-gnu-linux --passes='print<machine-block-freq>' -filetype=null 2>&1 %s | FileCheck %s
 
 ---
 name:            is_odd

@paperchalice paperchalice merged commit c5ee3c0 into llvm:main Jul 12, 2024
7 of 9 checks passed
@paperchalice paperchalice deleted the fix branch July 14, 2024 05:37
aaryanshukla pushed a commit to aaryanshukla/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2024
Missing `-mtriple` in test, causes failure on some none x86 default
targets.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants