Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow initiator in response decoder supports method #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 10, 2021

Conversation

MortalFlesh
Copy link
Member

It puts all changes around lmc-eu/cqrs-types#3 together.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 24, 2021

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1063166492

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 839073146: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 190
Relevant Lines: 190

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 24, 2021

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1116851270

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1076104612: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 190
Relevant Lines: 190

💛 - Coveralls

@MortalFlesh MortalFlesh force-pushed the feature/allow-initiators-in-response-decoders branch from 96af925 to 44e370c Compare July 28, 2021 19:24
jirinovak
jirinovak previously approved these changes Aug 9, 2021
@MortalFlesh MortalFlesh force-pushed the feature/allow-initiators-in-response-decoders branch from 44e370c to 8b4dfb5 Compare August 10, 2021 13:47
@MortalFlesh MortalFlesh merged commit b83e830 into main Aug 10, 2021
@MortalFlesh MortalFlesh deleted the feature/allow-initiators-in-response-decoders branch August 10, 2021 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants