Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 23, 2020. It is now read-only.

MAB field 675 shouldn't be taken into account by mapping #479

Closed
acka47 opened this issue May 28, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

MAB field 675 shouldn't be taken into account by mapping #479

acka47 opened this issue May 28, 2014 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

acka47 commented May 28, 2014

Currently MAB field 675 (" Stichwörter in abweichender Autographie") is mapped to http://rdvocab.info/Elements/otherTitleInformation. Example: http://lobid.org/resource/HT017557732/about.

This might somehow make sense because keywords may somehow be seen as "other title information" but it definitely doesn't look good in the NWBib presentation, see e.g. here.

This issue was raised by NWBib editors.

@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented May 28, 2014

It would be nicer to have an other property (which would not compromise our RDFa HTML view) to be able to search those terms instead of get rid of them in whole, as they are fine search terms expansions (St. => Sankt, etc.).
@acka47 has to find some proper property or mint one himself.

@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented May 28, 2014

(in the meantime I will disable the field).

dr0i added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2014
See #479.

* update test
@acka47
Copy link
Contributor Author

acka47 commented May 28, 2014

I couldn't find a property for "title keyword" anywhere. Will mint http://purl.org/lobid/lv#titleKeyword after Bibtag but you can already use it in the data.

@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented Jun 10, 2014

Deployed to staging , also with updated jsonld context:
http://staging.api.lobid.org/resource/HT017557732/about

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor Author

acka47 commented Jun 10, 2014

Again, this is already deployed on production so that I can't compare with the previous version. :-/ However, this looks good.
+1

@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented Jun 10, 2014

Deployed json context to production, closing.

@dr0i dr0i closed this as completed Jun 10, 2014
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants