Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bake in namespacing #45

Closed
jwlrs opened this issue Feb 12, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

Bake in namespacing #45

jwlrs opened this issue Feb 12, 2014 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@jwlrs
Copy link

jwlrs commented Feb 12, 2014

It would be awesome for this library to add namespacing as a core concept from the start. This would mean other libraries could be built that depend on localForage and do so in a way that avoids collisions/conflicts.

See https://github.com/joelarson4/LSNS for my train of thought.

@jokeyrhyme
Copy link

In practice, does this mean using separate databases in WebSQL and IndexedDB for each namespace? And prefixes in localStorage, etc?

@jokeyrhyme
Copy link

Related to #4 ?

@tofumatt
Copy link
Member

I think it would mean separate databases for any engine that supports it, yeah. Not sure what the ramifications are there in terms of dialogs or storage, but I think it’d be fine.

@peey
Copy link

peey commented Aug 20, 2014

@tofumatt : Just to get a rough idea, how high is this feature on your priority list?

@tofumatt
Copy link
Member

It's something I'd like but likely won't have time to write myself for a month. A pull request for this feature I'd give lots of attention to though. :-)

tofumatt (Sent from mobile)

On August 20, 2014 1:37:33 PM ADT, peey notifications@github.com wrote:

@tofumatt : Just to get a rough idea, how high is this feature on your
priority list?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#45 (comment)

@thgreasi
Copy link
Member

thgreasi commented Oct 6, 2014

Is this closed by #253?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants