Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch Markdown library #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 15, 2014
Merged

Conversation

joel
Copy link
Contributor

@joel joel commented Apr 15, 2014

FIX #21

joel added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2014
@joel joel merged commit 103ea56 into master Apr 15, 2014
@joel joel deleted the change_markdown_library_for_jruby_support branch April 15, 2014 14:30
@rvalyi
Copy link

rvalyi commented Apr 15, 2014

Hello,

I'm all for JRuby support. But because kramdown is pure Ruby vs Redcarpet which has C extensions, it's probable (that's worth checking though) that kramdown is slower than Redcarpet on CRuby. JRuby is likely to be faster than C Ruby anyway, but eventually on CRuby this change could make LocomotiveCMS slower.

So I wonder if this is okay to just use kramedown as you did or if it's better to conditionally switch to kramdown depending on the selected Ruby Runtime (with a common abstraction wrapper to manipulate it).

Not a big deal, just wondering...

marcreynolds pushed a commit to ezeratech/steam that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2016
…n_library_for_jruby_support

Switch Markdown library
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

JRuby support
2 participants