Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow repeat extensions #124

Open
marksteward opened this issue Nov 24, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Allow repeat extensions #124

marksteward opened this issue Nov 24, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@marksteward
Copy link
Member

For things like the bikeshed (https://london.hackspace.org.uk/storage/26), we want to allow repeat extensions. Each extension should probably be approved by someone who isn't the original owner (or maybe require multiple approvals?), and emails should be sent as usual.

The usual single-extension state should probably also remain, so I suggest a new state, Extended (recurring).

@chixor
Copy link
Contributor

chixor commented Nov 24, 2015

How do you decide who gets reoccurring and who doesn't? Isn't that like
gold membership?

But hey, up to you! :)

On Tuesday, 24 November 2015, Mark Steward notifications@github.com wrote:

For things like the bikeshed (https://london.hackspace.org.uk/storage/26),
we want to allow repeat extensions. Each extension should probably be
approved by someone who isn't the original owner, and emails should be sent
as usual.

The usual single-extension state should probably also remain, so I suggest
a new state, Extended (recurring).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#124
.

@marksteward
Copy link
Member Author

Was thinking a minimum number of people, rather than privileges. But then I guess that's sort of a popularity contest, so possibly problematic.

@chixor
Copy link
Contributor

chixor commented Nov 25, 2015

Maybe projects which have had 3 previously approved storage requests for
the same thing (based on an identical title and description) qualify for
reoccurring? Essentially it just reduces duplicates in the database but the
process is the same, it still goes up for approval.

On 25 November 2015 at 10:16, Mark Steward notifications@github.com wrote:

Was thinking a minimum number of people, rather than privileges. But then
I guess that's sort of a popularity contest, so possibly problematic.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#124 (comment)
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants