Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

read end reason #233

Closed
ylang0825 opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

read end reason #233

ylang0825 opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ylang0825
Copy link

Hi everyone!
I have successfully used readfish to enrich the target and I'm quite confused about the reads splitted by end reasons. After running readfish, In the MinKNOW UI, I observed a purple bar emerged with the "Adaptive sampling voltage reversal" label, which I think reflects readfish's unblocking. However, there is also a high red bar labeled "Read became blocked" and a tiny orange bar labeled "Unblock voltage reversal". I wonder what these two labels means? Are they also produced by readfish? Since it seems these two bars did not appear in non-adaptive sequencing.

By the way, is there any difference between readfish and on-board MinKNOW adaptive sequencing? It seems that they use the same strategy. Or they may use different parameters?

Thanks very much!

@mattloose
Copy link
Contributor

You are correct that the purple bar labelled "Adaptive sampling voltage reversal" is the action of ReadFish's unblocking.

The label "read became blocked" and "unblock voltage reversal" are classifications that may be caused by either a bit of DNA blocked in the pore or by the activity of ReadFish itself. Because the classification of reads is so fast it is possible that errors can be made.

Those states do appear during normal sequencing - the only one that is specific to adaptive sampling is "Adaptive sampling voltage reversal". On a library that is not particuarly blocky you won't see many of the other categories but they are there.

The difference between readfish and onboard MinKNOW adaptive sequencing is the granularity of control that you can get with readfish. Essentially readfish is more configurable than standard adaptive sampling and you can do things like change the reference and targets during sequencing (which currently you can't do with on-board MinKNOW adaptive sequencing). If you are running a standard fixed panel then you should work with the built in adaptive sampling. If you want to do more sophisticated things like barcodes with different panels or other iterative adaptive sampling experiments something like readfish is more suitable.

hope that helps.

@LooseLab LooseLab locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 15, 2023
@Adoni5 Adoni5 converted this issue into discussion #238 May 15, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants