Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: Prefer non empty json include annotation #8224

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

krusche
Copy link
Member

@krusche krusche commented Mar 19, 2024

Checklist

General

Motivation and Context

We want to always use @JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_EMPTY).

Description

Added an architecture test and fixed its violations.

Steps for Testing

code review

Review Progress

Code Review

  • Code Review 1
  • Code Review 2

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved JSON serialization handling of empty values across various classes for better data presentation in the application, impacting teams, notifications, participations, lecture units, quizzes, results, tutorial groups, learning paths, and science events.
  • Tests
    • Introduced a new test method to ensure correct usage of updated JSON serialization annotations, maintaining data integrity and consistency.
  • Chores
    • Added StringUtils import for StringUtils.isEmpty() method in LectureUnitProcessingService.java.
    • Replaced isEmpty() with isNullOrEmpty() in ResultServiceIntegrationTest.java for more precise point per criterion assertion.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) label Mar 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tests label Mar 19, 2024
@Strohgelaender Strohgelaender marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2024 15:45
@Strohgelaender Strohgelaender requested a review from a team as a code owner March 19, 2024 15:45
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The overall change across various files in the project involves updating the @JsonInclude annotation from NON_NULL to NON_EMPTY. This modification affects how JSON serialization handles null and empty values, aiming for a more concise and meaningful JSON output by excluding both null and empty fields. Additionally, a new test method has been introduced to ensure the correct application of this annotation across the project, enhancing the consistency and reliability of JSON data representation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.../domain/Team.java
.../notification/NotificationTarget.java
.../participation/StudentParticipation.java
.../web/rest/dto/LectureUnitInformationDTO.java
.../web/rest/dto/QuizBatchJoinDTO.java
.../web/rest/dto/ResultWithPointsPerGradingCriterionDTO.java
.../web/rest/dto/TutorialGroupFreePeriodDTO.java
.../web/rest/dto/competency/LearningPathHealthDTO.java
.../web/rest/dto/competency/NgxLearningPathDTO.java
.../web/rest/dto/science/ScienceEventDTO.java
Changed the @JsonInclude annotation from NON_NULL to NON_EMPTY, affecting JSON serialization by excluding null and empty fields from the output.
.../service/LectureUnitProcessingService.java Added an import statement for StringUtils from org.apache.commons.lang3 to use StringUtils.isEmpty() method for checking empty strings in LectureUnitProcessingService.java.
.../test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/ArchitectureTest.java Extended functionality to include a new test method testJsonIncludeNonEmpty() to verify the presence of @JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_EMPTY) annotation, with added imports for JavaEnumConstant and HasAnnotations.
.../test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/assessment/ResultServiceIntegrationTest.java Replaced usages of isEmpty() with isNullOrEmpty() in two test methods for asserting points per criterion in results with points.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently. Therefore, this pull request has been automatically marked as stale and will be closed if no further activity occurs within seven days. Thank you for your contributions.

@krusche krusche added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Apr 1, 2024
@krusche krusche merged commit 579cb5e into develop Apr 1, 2024
31 of 35 checks passed
@krusche krusche deleted the chore/consistent-json-include branch April 1, 2024 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready for review server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) stale tests
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants