Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-39681: Add LATISS pipelines to ap_pipe to be used by prompt processing #142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 16, 2023

Conversation

hsinfang
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@kfindeisen kfindeisen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit surprised that you could get the pipeline to run with only default configs, but I see that DRP doesn't have any LATISS-specific configs, either. Just a few comments about keeping the pipeline in this package as generic and forward-compatible as possible.

Comment on lines 5 to 13
include:
- isr
- characterizeImage
- calibrate
- retrieveTemplate
- subtractImages
- detectAndMeasure
- transformDiaSrcCat
- diaPipe
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd recommend not enumerating these tasks -- they are subject to change, and it will surprise developers if only this pipeline breaks but the others (which only exclude) do not.

- transformDiaSrcCat
- diaPipe
parameters:
coaddName: deep
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems an odd thing to put in the main pipeline, since the correct value of coaddName is a function of the data the pipeline is run on. Is it expected that all LATISS coadds will be deep? If not, I recommend this be moved to lsst-dm/prompt_processing#73.

@hsinfang hsinfang merged commit 21362d4 into main Jun 16, 2023
1 check passed
@hsinfang hsinfang deleted the tickets/DM-39681 branch June 16, 2023 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants