Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-39949: Expand quantum cluster dims: include implied dims #147

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

leeskelvin
Copy link
Contributor

@leeskelvin leeskelvin commented Jul 10, 2023

Checklist

  • ran Jenkins
  • added a release note for user-visible changes to doc/changes

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (d22dc5f) 78.71% compared to head (ceb94cb) 78.71%.

❗ Current head ceb94cb differs from pull request most recent head 215b17b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 215b17b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #147   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.71%   78.71%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        3091     3091           
  Branches      518      518           
=======================================
  Hits         2433     2433           
  Misses        568      568           
  Partials       90       90           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
python/lsst/ctrl/bps/quantum_clustering_funcs.py 97.29% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@leeskelvin leeskelvin merged commit ec89675 into main Jul 11, 2023
10 checks passed
@leeskelvin leeskelvin deleted the tickets/DM-39949 branch July 11, 2023 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants