DM-37231: Switch to dual license

[timj]

Checklist

• ran Jenkins
• added a release note for user-visible changes to doc/changes

[timj]

@jchiang87 given the history of this repo, do you want it to switch to entirely BSD 3-clause rather than dual license? Now that ctrl_bps will be dual-license this means that this package could declare that it's using the BSD 3-clause licensing option for the other middleware packages and not involve GPL at all. The other packages are required to be GPL because of Rubin contracts but this started off outside the project.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (fe186b8) 39.28% compared to head (a6bf71f) 39.28%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #19   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   39.28%   39.28%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         336      336           
  Branches       60       60           
=======================================
  Hits          132      132           
  Misses        198      198           
  Partials        6        6           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
python/lsst/ctrl/bps/parsl/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
python/lsst/ctrl/bps/parsl/configuration.py	44.18% <ø> (ø)
python/lsst/ctrl/bps/parsl/environment.py	23.07% <ø> (ø)
python/lsst/ctrl/bps/parsl/job.py	30.00% <ø> (ø)
python/lsst/ctrl/bps/parsl/service.py	36.84% <ø> (ø)
python/lsst/ctrl/bps/parsl/site.py	51.06% <ø> (ø)
python/lsst/ctrl/bps/parsl/workflow.py	28.97% <ø> (ø)
tests/test_config.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
tests/test_import.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jchiang87]

I'm ok with using a dual license for this repo.