Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-13869: Implement basic Registry.find and related functionality #23

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Mar 22, 2018

Conversation

pschella
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@timj
Copy link
Member

timj commented Mar 22, 2018

I'd be wary of running autopep8 on the entire code base when we know we are already flake8 clean.

Copy link
Member

@timj timj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is fine. I'd like us to stop running autopep8 in the future given that we already pass flake8. DM-13869 says it is meant to be working on Butler.get but I don't think this is (and I'm working on that).

@pschella
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Running autopep8 is my lazy way of being flake8 compatible (at least for the multi-line sql annoyance). But I'll stop running it on a non-file-to-file basis now.
As for DM-13869, it doesn't work for Butler.get (and put) because it assumes a Datastore interface that doesn't exist yet. But it shouldn't not work because something is missing in Registry. If that is not the case there is a bug in my code.

@pschella pschella merged commit 795f8ff into master Mar 22, 2018
@timj
Copy link
Member

timj commented Mar 22, 2018

Can you enable flake8 checking in your editor? It's just I'm worried about autopep8 fiddling with things that currently are fine.

@ktlim ktlim deleted the tickets/DM-13869 branch August 25, 2018 06:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants