DM-37036: Fix type annotations in lsst.daf.butler.tests

[timj]

Checklist

• ran Jenkins
• added a release note for user-visible changes to doc/changes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 85.29% // Head: 85.33% // Increases project coverage by +0.03% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (148a536) compared to base (b839107).
Patch coverage: 84.65% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #756      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.29%   85.33%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         260      260              
  Lines       34468    34535      +67     
  Branches     5810     5813       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        29401    29469      +68     
+ Misses       3824     3823       -1     
  Partials     1243     1243              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
python/lsst/daf/butler/core/storageClass.py	93.93% <ø> (ø)
python/lsst/daf/butler/tests/cliCmdTestBase.py	73.84% <65.21%> (-6.52%)	⬇️
python/lsst/daf/butler/core/logging.py	95.83% <71.42%> (-0.84%)	⬇️
python/lsst/daf/butler/tests/cliLogTestBase.py	85.90% <74.19%> (-4.54%)	⬇️
python/lsst/daf/butler/tests/_datasetsHelper.py	84.05% <85.71%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
...ython/lsst/daf/butler/tests/_examplePythonTypes.py	88.11% <85.71%> (-2.00%)	⬇️
python/lsst/daf/butler/tests/utils.py	97.67% <85.71%> (+3.42%)	⬆️
python/lsst/daf/butler/tests/_testRepo.py	91.15% <92.30%> (+13.85%)	⬆️
python/lsst/daf/butler/tests/_dummyRegistry.py	85.55% <95.23%> (+0.32%)	⬆️
python/lsst/daf/butler/tests/deferredFormatter.py	77.77% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 3 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[andy-slac]

Looks good, few minor comments.

[andy-slac]

Some of these should come from collections.abc?

[timj]

Yes, although I wasn't fixing up old syntax in core files (black reformatted it because I added overload).