Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-37984: Move rc2_subset DRP pipeline definitions to drp_pipe #54

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 16, 2023

Conversation

leeskelvin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@leeskelvin leeskelvin force-pushed the tickets/DM-37984 branch 2 times, most recently from 20760be to f17fad2 Compare February 15, 2023 16:45
Copy link
Contributor

@jeffcarlin jeffcarlin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few small comments, but mostly looks good. Note that we'll also need to update the shell script in rc2_subset that executes the processing.

time, because otherwise quanta will be created for jobs with only partial
visit coverage.
isolatedStarAssociation can be run with or without 'tract' constraints.
nightlyStep2cde:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it work to include FGCM in the same step with the other tasks? In rc2_subset, FGCM has been separate because it explicitly has to be run on a single processor. Is that true of the other tasks here, or would it improve performance to keep them separate?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Jeff. Following a conversation with @erykoff, I've decided to revert this change and maintain the three FGCM tasks in their own nightlyStep3c subset, with the remainder continuing on as before in nightlyStep2d. To that end, the only actual pipeline changes should now be the addition of makeVisitTable and makeCcdVisitTable into nightlyStep2d. Other proposed changes, such as moving isolatedStarAssociation from nightlyStep2b into nightlyStep2a (as in DRP-RC2.yaml) have also been dropped.

visit coverage.
isolatedStarAssociation can be run with or without 'tract' constraints.
nightlyStep2cde:
subset:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think TE3 and TE4 should also be in this subset (per-visit tasks)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These have been moved back to their former home in nightlyStep2d.

Comment on lines 400 to 401
- TE3
- TE4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See note above - TE3 and TE4 are per-visit tasks, so should be in Step2cde?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These have been moved back to their former home in nightlyStep2d.

detector-level quanta are desired.
nightlyStep5:
subset:
- nsrcMeasVisit
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a per-visit task, so should be in Step2cde?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has been moved back to its former home in nightlyStep2d.

@leeskelvin leeskelvin merged commit caf595e into main Feb 16, 2023
@leeskelvin leeskelvin deleted the tickets/DM-37984 branch February 16, 2023 03:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants