Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-42291: Provide a default argument for schema renumbering to modify-tap command #32

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

JeremyMcCormick
Copy link
Collaborator

Add a default of 0 so that a TypeError does not occur when the "--start-schema-at" option is unspecified.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4a5de05) 92.61% compared to head (e7043a8) 92.61%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #32      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.61%   92.61%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        1951     1949       -2     
  Branches      381      380       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1807     1805       -2     
  Misses         87       87              
  Partials       57       57              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@gpdf gpdf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is an appropriate solution to the problem.

Add a default of 0 so that a TypeError does not occur when the
"--start-schema-at" option is unspecified.
Adding a reasonable default makes this unnecessary.
@JeremyMcCormick JeremyMcCormick merged commit b41b8de into main Feb 2, 2024
10 checks passed
@JeremyMcCormick JeremyMcCormick deleted the tickets/DM-42291 branch February 2, 2024 17:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants