New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DM-30927: Set calexp WCS to None for failed astrometric fit #198
Conversation
8181501
to
a2ce461
Compare
a2ce461
to
7131fa9
Compare
7131fa9
to
c67ad0f
Compare
c67ad0f
to
dee2158
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for doing the doc updates, etc. How were the log warning changes not done yet, I'm curious?
python/lsst/ip/diffim/getTemplate.py
Outdated
`lsst.daf.butler.DeferredDatasetHandle` of | ||
`lsst.afw.image.Exposure` | ||
Dict of the patches containing valid data for each tract. | ||
coaddRefs : `list` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you run package-docs build
on this branch? This multi-line listing of types makes sphinx very upset. I think you need to instead do something like
"""
coaddRefs : `list` [`lsst.daf.butler.DeferredDatasetHandle`]
Data references to `~lsst.afw.Image.Exposure` representing DcrModels
that overlap the detector.
"""
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, no, I had not...but I have now. I admit to knowing nothing about sphinx, so am happy to go with your suggestion. For the record, I ran package-docs build
on the branch as is and copied the doc
folder to my local machine and looked at it via opening doc/_build/html/index.html
and here's what it looks like:
and with your edit:
Either works for me!
🤷 |
Specifically, if the exposure under consideration has its WCS set to None, do not attempt to retrieve the difference imaging template.
dee2158
to
86c72ac
Compare
No description provided.