Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-30927: Set calexp WCS to None for failed astrometric fit #198

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 30, 2022

Conversation

laurenam
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@erykoff erykoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing the doc updates, etc. How were the log warning changes not done yet, I'm curious?

`lsst.daf.butler.DeferredDatasetHandle` of
`lsst.afw.image.Exposure`
Dict of the patches containing valid data for each tract.
coaddRefs : `list`
Copy link
Member

@timj timj Sep 14, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you run package-docs build on this branch? This multi-line listing of types makes sphinx very upset. I think you need to instead do something like

"""
coaddRefs : `list` [`lsst.daf.butler.DeferredDatasetHandle`]
    Data references to `~lsst.afw.Image.Exposure` representing DcrModels
    that overlap the detector.
"""

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, no, I had not...but I have now. I admit to knowing nothing about sphinx, so am happy to go with your suggestion. For the record, I ran package-docs build on the branch as is and copied the doc folder to my local machine and looked at it via opening doc/_build/html/index.html and here's what it looks like:
docsDM-30927_getDcrModel
and with your edit:
docsTimEdit_getDcrModel
Either works for me!

@laurenam
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for doing the doc updates, etc. How were the log warning changes not done yet, I'm curious?

🤷

Specifically, if the exposure under consideration has its WCS set to
None, do not attempt to retrieve the difference imaging template.
@laurenam laurenam merged commit 8a851bd into main Sep 30, 2022
@laurenam laurenam deleted the tickets/DM-30927 branch September 30, 2022 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants