Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-10302 Change flux->instFlux #109

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2018
Merged

DM-10302 Change flux->instFlux #109

merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2018

Conversation

parejkoj
Copy link
Collaborator

@parejkoj parejkoj commented Sep 1, 2018

No description provided.

@parejkoj parejkoj force-pushed the tickets/DM-10302 branch 2 times, most recently from 7c5684c to d06cfb5 Compare September 4, 2018 18:42
Copy link
Contributor

@r-owen r-owen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small requested change

python/lsst/jointcal/testUtils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
The correct field to use is the CalibFlux field (not GaussianFlux nee
InstFlux), but I'd also been calling it the instFluxKeyName;
it was really the name of the fluxField, not the key.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants