-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DM-36395: Support incremental redefinition of multi-snap visits #447
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d2a14e4
Fix multiprocessing pool ResourceWarning in ingest
timj 54b9ca2
Add update-records option to butler define-visits
timj c4cd6e0
Allow multi-snap visits to be redefined incrementally
timj d647bcf
Add --incremental update option that will update visit_definition ent…
timj c67d8de
Change the test_all test to test all
timj 82c13e1
Add tests for incremental visit definition
timj ee1505e
Add news fragment
timj 1c7d142
Allow visit definition to work with a single exposure in multi-snap
timj 1594078
Tweak the docstrings for incremental mode
timj 491c13c
Create DataCoordinate directly rather than querying dataIDs
timj 112cb9b
Optimize missing query to only ask for exposures that we don't have
timj File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
Added support for defining visits incrementally as exposures are ingested. | ||
This allows files from the telescope to be ingested one at a time whilst redefining the existing visits. | ||
Additionally ``--update-records`` and ``--incremental`` have been added to the ``butler define-visits`` command-line. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems kind of a shame to have this by group, then merge it all into one big list, then group again. But I guess that keeps the interfaces simple.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it does, although I think there is a proposal to remove this subclass completely in #453 so it's not worth trying to make it more efficient.