Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-19329: Add comCam support to obs_lsst #118

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Jul 25, 2019
Merged

DM-19329: Add comCam support to obs_lsst #118

merged 11 commits into from Jul 25, 2019

Conversation

timj
Copy link
Member

@timj timj commented Jun 17, 2019

  • Basic policy files for this raft copied from TS8
  • Minimalist translator that inherits from lsstCam.

No butler gen 2 tests yet.

policy/.gitignore Show resolved Hide resolved
policy/SConscript Show resolved Hide resolved
policy/comCam/R22.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
python: lsst.daf.base.PropertyList
storage: FitsStorage
tables: raw
template: raw/%(run)s/%(raftName)s/%(visit)08d-%(raftName)s-%(detectorName)s-det%(detector)03d-%(snap)03d.fits[0]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we still have the concept of runs for ComCam? Maybe we do. I'm not even sure where this is supposed to support data from, so perhaps this is fine, but I think this was really only a TS8 and TS3 concept. If the data is there in the headers then it's fine though. If not, then here and throughout this file run will need addressing.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a generic obs_lsst gen2 question. lsstCam supports run so surely comCam should to. It gets set to "unknown". If we remove it we should have the broader discussion on lsstCam as well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm surprise it's needed on lsstCam as well, but if it is, then yes, I agree to leave it.

policy/comCam/comCamMapper.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
python/lsst/obs/lsst/comCam.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
python/lsst/obs/lsst/comCam.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/test_comCam.py Show resolved Hide resolved
timj added 3 commits July 25, 2019 09:21
This reverts commit f487f44.

The test data directory includes butler and fits files so we
can not ignore all of them.
@timj timj merged commit ce492fc into master Jul 25, 2019
@timj timj deleted the tickets/DM-19329 branch July 25, 2019 22:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants