New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DM-30342: Add detect flags to object tables #314
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After the suggested updates, I think it's good to go.
policy/imsim/Object.yaml
Outdated
- calib_psf_used | ||
- merge_measurement_band |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From what I can tell, this should simply be merge_measurement
. Then add a renaming rule at the bottom like ['merge_', 'Merge_']
. (The band will be appended at the beginning to create, e.g., zMerge_measurement
.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But where should it go? The comment in Object.yaml says # refFlags are columns taken without translation from the ref table
, so it sounds like the band isn't passed through them. And the flags section says # flags are columns taken and exploded per-band from the meas tables
, but I don't think that these columns exist in the meas tables.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that I'm just going to call merge_measurement
out of scope and assign that to a new ticket.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm OK with calling merge_measurement
out of scope for this one. But I think you will still need the renaming rule for merge_
--> Merge_
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, that change is about to be pushed.
policy/imsim/Source.yaml
Outdated
- detect_isDeblendedSource | ||
- detect_isDeblendedModelSource | ||
- merge_peak_sky | ||
- merge_measurement_band |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment above. Note also that the same renaming rule proposed above is needed for merge_peak_sky
, too.
1f7c272
to
984f4e9
Compare
984f4e9
to
a6ca213
Compare
No description provided.