Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-30342: Add detect flags to object tables #314

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 27, 2021
Merged

Conversation

fred3m
Copy link

@fred3m fred3m commented May 26, 2021

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@jeffcarlin jeffcarlin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After the suggested updates, I think it's good to go.

- calib_psf_used
- merge_measurement_band
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From what I can tell, this should simply be merge_measurement. Then add a renaming rule at the bottom like ['merge_', 'Merge_']. (The band will be appended at the beginning to create, e.g., zMerge_measurement.)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But where should it go? The comment in Object.yaml says # refFlags are columns taken without translation from the ref table, so it sounds like the band isn't passed through them. And the flags section says # flags are columns taken and exploded per-band from the meas tables, but I don't think that these columns exist in the meas tables.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that I'm just going to call merge_measurement out of scope and assign that to a new ticket.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm OK with calling merge_measurement out of scope for this one. But I think you will still need the renaming rule for merge_ --> Merge_?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, that change is about to be pushed.

- detect_isDeblendedSource
- detect_isDeblendedModelSource
- merge_peak_sky
- merge_measurement_band
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comment above. Note also that the same renaming rule proposed above is needed for merge_peak_sky, too.

@yalsayyad yalsayyad merged commit 0fc1367 into master May 27, 2021
@yalsayyad yalsayyad deleted the tickets/DM-30342 branch May 27, 2021 06:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants