Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-32129: Add a maximum mean offset threshold for SFM astrometry fit success #359

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 15, 2021

Conversation

laurenam
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@laurenam laurenam force-pushed the tickets/DM-32129 branch 3 times, most recently from 4e94ac7 to 0fb53a3 Compare October 14, 2021 18:19
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
config.photoRefObjLoader.load(os.path.join(configDir, "filterMap.py"))

config.astrometry.doMagnitudeOutlierRejection = True
# Set threshold above which astrometry will be considered a failure (DM-32129)
config.astrometry.maxMeanDistanceArcsec = 0.08
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a scatter of ~0.4 pixels, right? That seems bad to me! But this includes the scatter in the measurement, and is thus band and s/n dependent, etc. I would still personally advocate for something closer to 0.05. We lose some few more, but these aren't especially good fits anyway, and we don't have any jointcal afterburner to improve things.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm so down with 0.05! I have posted per-band distributions to the ticket (nothing too striking, I don't think).

This tolerance was conditioned on looking at the distribution of the
sample of 30495 successful SFM fits of the tract 4431 processing run
of PREOPS-631 (see DM-32129 for justification).
@laurenam laurenam merged commit c16f5c0 into master Oct 15, 2021
@laurenam laurenam deleted the tickets/DM-32129 branch October 15, 2021 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants