Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-40301: Update configurations to use large 35 pixel aperture for LATISS calibration. #466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

erykoff
Copy link
Contributor

@erykoff erykoff commented Aug 15, 2023

The default 12 pixel aperture is much too small for the LATISS platescale.

@@ -42,3 +42,7 @@
config.doWriteMatchesDenormalized = True

config.measurement.plugins["base_Jacobian"].pixelScale = 0.1

# Set the default aperture as appropriate for the LATISS platescale.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huh...I always think of "plate scale" as two words (here and elsewhere in this PR if you decided to change it, but I'm not insisting!)

'y',
'apFlux_50_0_instFlux',
'apFlux_50_0_instFluxErr',
'apFlux_50_0_flag',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why 50 here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For testing background offsets, fgcm uses the calibration aperture plus 1 larger. 50 is that one larger. (And the calibration flux already gets transferred, this is just the "extra" bit.)

The default 12 pixel aperture is much too small for the LATISS platescale.
@erykoff erykoff merged commit 766e54a into main Aug 16, 2023
3 checks passed
@erykoff erykoff deleted the tickets/DM-40301 branch August 16, 2023 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants