Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-11090: Identify regression in HSC astrometric matching success rate between w_2017_17 and w_2017_25 #85

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 21, 2017

Conversation

laurenam
Copy link
Contributor

The expansion of the bbox search radius for reference objects to
bbox + maxOffsetPix (added in DM-9750) caused a significant regression
in the astrometric matching. It seems this is due to an issue with how
matchOptimisticB is handling large numbers of reference stars. The
default in obs_subaru of maxOffsetPix = 750 resulted in a significant
number of CCDs failing in processCcd (identified in DM-11020). Here we
set that default to maxOffsetPix = 250 which effectively results in the
same number of CCDs in the RC dataset passing single frame processing
and equivalent quality based on a comparison of QA plots for the pre-
regression and post-fix runs.

The expansion of the bbox search radius for reference objects to
bbox + maxOffsetPix (added in DM-9750) caused a significant regression
in the astrometric matching.  It seems this is due to an issue with how
matchOptimisticB is handling large numbers of reference stars.  The
default in obs_subaru of maxOffsetPix = 750 resulted in a significant
number of CCDs failing in processCcd (identified in DM-11020).  Here we
set that default to maxOffsetPix = 250 which effectively results in the
same number of CCDs in the RC dataset passing single frame processing
and equivalent quality based on a comparison of QA plots for the pre-
regression and post-fix runs.
@laurenam laurenam merged commit 65510dc into master Jul 21, 2017
@ktlim ktlim deleted the tickets/DM-11090 branch August 25, 2018 06:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant