Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-38948: Fix handling of dataset query constraint options in QG generation. #324

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 29, 2023

Conversation

TallJimbo
Copy link
Member

@TallJimbo TallJimbo commented Apr 28, 2023

...Probably. It was definitely broken by DM-38780, but there are still no tests to show that it works now.

Checklist

  • ran Jenkins
  • added a release note for user-visible changes to doc/changes

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 31.81% and project coverage change: -0.15 ⚠️

Comparison is base (df2cacc) 82.33% compared to head (144ec73) 82.19%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #324      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.33%   82.19%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          60       60              
  Lines        6663     6678      +15     
  Branches     1360     1366       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         5486     5489       +3     
- Misses        907      916       +9     
- Partials      270      273       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
python/lsst/pipe/base/graphBuilder.py 64.32% <31.81%> (-0.89%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TallJimbo
Copy link
Member Author

I have not added a changelog entry because I figure we'll get this in pretty soon, and hence aside from a daily or two it'll be as if nothing happened. Happy to entertain other perspectives on that.

Copy link
Contributor

@andy-slac andy-slac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Comment on lines 1106 to 1107
# container to accumulate datasets in self.missing, if the common
# dataIds were not constrained on dataset type existence.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"container to" is probably not needed here?

...Probably.  It was definitely broken by DM-38780, but there are still
no tests to show that it works now.
@TallJimbo TallJimbo merged commit a2643ed into main Apr 29, 2023
8 of 10 checks passed
@TallJimbo TallJimbo deleted the tickets/DM-38948 branch April 29, 2023 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants