Fix DrizzleSQLiteAdapter constructor signature

[yu7400ki]

In the signature of the DrizzleSQLiteAdapter constructor, the generic type TFullSchema of BaseSQLiteDatabase was not set. Consequently, an instance with a schema couldn't be passed.

example

import { DrizzleSQLiteAdapter } from "@lucia-auth/adapter-drizzle";
import { Database } from "bun:sqlite";
import { sqliteTable, text, integer } from "drizzle-orm/sqlite-core";
import { drizzle } from "drizzle-orm/bun-sqlite";

const sqliteDB = new Database(":memory:");

const userTable = sqliteTable("user", {
  id: text("id").notNull().primaryKey(),
});

const sessionTable = sqliteTable("user_session", {
  id: text("id").notNull().primaryKey(),
  userId: text("user_id")
    .notNull()
    .references(() => userTable.id),
  expiresAt: integer("expires_at").notNull(),
});

const db = drizzle(sqliteDB);
new DrizzleSQLiteAdapter(db, sessionTable, userTable); // <- OK

const dbWithSchema = drizzle(sqliteDB, { schema: { userTable, sessionTable } });
new DrizzleSQLiteAdapter(dbWithSchema, sessionTable, userTable); // <- Error

[pilcrowOnPaper]

Do you know if this is just an issue with SQLite? I know someone had issues with MySQL as well

[yu7400ki]

Do you know if this is just an issue with SQLite? I know someone had issues with MySQL as well

In MySQL, the initial value of TFullSchema is set to {}, so I don't think this problem would occur. If you're interested, could you please share more details about that particular issue?

As for Postgres, since any is already set, I don't anticipate encountering a similar problem there.

[yu7400ki]

Having said that, setting any for all generics of SQLiteDatabase and other Databases might not be a bad idea.

[pilcrowOnPaper]

Thanks!