Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README.md - Bad instructions for 1.x #172

Closed
shivpatel opened this issue Dec 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

README.md - Bad instructions for 1.x #172

shivpatel opened this issue Dec 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@shivpatel
Copy link

I'll try to PR updates to the README.md file. In the meantime, making this ticket with the correct directions for anyone trying to build the latest release for themselves:

  1. npm run pack. Quit the process once the webpack analyzer graphic pops up.
  2. node bin/pack.js
  3. Don't worry about Unhandled rejection Error: No identity found for signing. error.
  4. Packaged app ready at dist/out/Medis-mas-x64/Medis.app
doublesharp added a commit to doublesharp/medis that referenced this issue Feb 20, 2020
use the static option for the webpack analyzer vs the default of "server" so that webpack will exit and package the app.

Fixes issue in luin#172
@divineforge
Copy link

This is useful :O just wonder why it wasn't displayed or shown at the README.md

@luin
Copy link
Owner

luin commented Sep 17, 2023

Hello 👋

Our development focus has now shifted to the next generation of Medis: Medis 2. Compared to its predecessor, Medis 2 offers enhanced performance, more powerful features, and a more delightful interface. If you encounter any problems with Medis 2, feel free to reopen this issue, and together, we can explore possible solutions.

Download Medis 2 for free: https://getmedis.com/. Thanks for using and supporting Medis 1!

@luin luin closed this as completed Sep 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants