Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: Upgrade lsp-smart-contracts to v0.7.0 #163

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 14, 2022

Conversation

CallumGrindle
Copy link
Contributor

@CallumGrindle CallumGrindle commented Sep 14, 2022

Upgrades lsp-smart-contracts to v0.7.0

Pending:
[] Upgrade erc725.js to enable ENCRYPT permissions
[] Add 0.7.0 base contract addresses into versions.json

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 14, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #163 (79a5fe1) into develop (bc6f6d6) will decrease coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #163      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    20.15%   20.00%   -0.16%     
===========================================
  Files           16       16              
  Lines         1022     1015       -7     
  Branches       344      344              
===========================================
- Hits           206      203       -3     
+ Misses         794      790       -4     
  Partials        22       22              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/lib/classes/proxy-deployer.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/lib/services/base-contract.service.ts 8.08% <ø> (+0.31%) ⬆️
src/lib/services/digital-asset.service.ts 6.70% <0.00%> (ø)
src/lib/helpers/config.helper.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@CallumGrindle CallumGrindle merged commit 761cd81 into develop Sep 14, 2022
@CallumGrindle CallumGrindle deleted the upgrade-smartcontracts-0.7.0 branch September 14, 2022 13:08
This was referenced Sep 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants