Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mesa-lib: Adding optional_depends for wayland. kde and especially plasma #432

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

stumbles
Copy link
Member

are making a slow walk towards this being the default. So we need it here
when you compile kde-workspace and plasma. There might be a few other kde
modules that can use this but kde-workspace is the one I know of for now
and of course plasma.

Unfortunately mesa does not provide any switches.

are making a slow walk towards this being the default. So we need it here
when you compile kde-workspace and plasma. There might be a few other kde
modules that can use this but kde-workspace is the one I know of for now
and of course plasma.
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ depends presentproto
depends Mako
depends nettle

optional_depends wayland "" "" "This is needed by various components of Plasma"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe --with-egl-platforms=wayland is a requirement as well. Since we add x11 and drm manually I doubt auto-detection really kicks in.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your right Ratler. Couldn't we get by with something like this;

—with-egl-platforms=x11,wayland,drm

@florin65
Copy link
Member

i guess better is to keep the optional_depend on wayland (xorg-server work without it most times) and in BUILD if waylannd is installed add it to the platforms string.

@florin65
Copy link
Member

retest this please

@lunar-linux-b01
Copy link

SUCCESS!

@Ratler Ratler closed this in 2f4ee1b May 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants