-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add jar patcher command to log4shell cli #308
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Please dont do bytte buddy or dynamic patching. There are many many flaws to this technique and IMO it's mostly showing off and not realistic. |
@mikebell90 i completely agree, simple is def better here. My approach for implementing this will be to only remove files that match known hashes like I have when scanning so that the risk of a false positive is very low. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The jar patcher will attempt to remove the JNDILookup class from log4j dependencies that have been discovered.
Read more about this approach here: https://www.lunasec.io/docs/blog/log4j-zero-day-mitigation-guide/#option-3-jndi-patch
We can possibly use this tool to perform the fix as well: https://github.com/nccgroup/log4j-jndi-be-gone
https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/21/l/patch-now-apache-log4j-vulnerability-called-log4shell-being-acti.html