Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion]: Support for syncing multiple .env.* files #14

Closed
tdeekens opened this issue May 27, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

[Suggestion]: Support for syncing multiple .env.* files #14

tdeekens opened this issue May 27, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@tdeekens
Copy link

Thanks for this great library. It solves an issue we've had with keeping .env files in sync and we're super glad we've found it.

We are wondering if it would be of interest for the library to support "fan-out" to multiple .env files from one .env.template.

Our setup often looks like:

.env.template
.env.local
.env.staging
.env.production

this helps us simulating and configuring interaction with different parts of the system. We would love to sync from the .env.template to all other env files. This would require, to my understanding, some globbing (in the root) by the library instead of relying on one file.

Thanks.

@luqmanoop
Copy link
Owner

Thanks, @tdeekens for submitting this issue. Although this is a really nice suggestion, it's not a priority right now but you can rest assured I'll look into it.

@luqmanoop luqmanoop added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jun 5, 2019
@luqmanoop
Copy link
Owner

Hi @tdeekens, I'm happy to announce that your request has been fulfilled. All thanks go to @akhilome for this addition

Support for syncing with multiple .env.* is now available in v2.2.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants