Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Develop merge - release 0.3.0.0 #224

Merged
merged 170 commits into from
Oct 26, 2020
Merged

Develop merge - release 0.3.0.0 #224

merged 170 commits into from
Oct 26, 2020

Conversation

VanDavv
Copy link
Contributor

@VanDavv VanDavv commented Oct 8, 2020

Awaiting #242

alex-luxonis and others added 30 commits August 14, 2020 22:23
Merging branch that adds a few objects to manage configurations and arguments. Also, changes to expose pipeline data for the potential to write better tests.
- use a mesh instead of homography
- disable mirroring the rectified frame (mirroring is normally a requirement for the Stereo Engine)
- set the color of the pixels at the Warp edges (may ease debugging)
alex-luxonis and others added 17 commits October 16, 2020 17:39
…d on local openvino installation to decide if compilation should be done locally or in cloud; add option -mct/--model-compilation-target=[auto, local, cloud]
Add model zoo w/ model downloader and compiler; remove all blobs
bypassing the need to update the python wheel, for cases where only the FW is changed
a custom FW possibly hardcoded by 'custom_fw_commit' in config_manager.py
fixed missing blob error in calibrate.py
@VanDavv
Copy link
Contributor Author

VanDavv commented Oct 23, 2020

Waiting for #244 before merging

@Luxonis-Brandon
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks.

So if #244 was already present in main (is it @Luxonis-Brian ?) I think we should merge before that. And then we can hot-fix main based on the fix for #244 . Thoughts?

@Luxonis-Brian
Copy link
Contributor

checking @Luxonis-Brandon....

@SzabolcsGergely
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks.

So if #244 was already present in main (is it @Luxonis-Brian ?) I think we should merge before that. And then we can hot-fix main based on the fix for #244 . Thoughts?

@alex-luxonis already fixed it, and opened a PR for it (waiting for CI to finish)

@Luxonis-Brandon
Copy link
Contributor

Ok perfect thanks!

@alex-luxonis
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, it's good to have #244 fixed, as the issue was not present in main.

@VanDavv VanDavv merged commit 8970b1d into release_0_3_0_0 Oct 26, 2020
@Luxonis-Brandon Luxonis-Brandon moved this from In Progress to Done in Gen1 Feature-Complete Release Oct 26, 2020
SzabolcsGergely pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2020
Develop merge - release 0.3.0.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants