Skip to content

We illustrate how to test the version of the Bell inequality proposed by David Mermin using Qiskit

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

lvillasen/Testing-Bell-Inequality-on-a-Quantum-Computer

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

48 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Testing Bell´s Inequality with Qiskit

We illustrate how to test the version of Bell´s inequality proposed by David Mermin using Qiskit. We do it on an ideal simulated quantum computer, a simulated quantum computer with noise and a real quantum computer from the IBM Quantum Experience.

See the references for a clear explanation of this version of Bell's inequality.

                                  EPR vs Quantum MECHANICS

The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger
"for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science"

We model, using a quantum computer, the measurement of the spin projections of two spin-1/2 entangled particles A and B which have total spin equal to zero along 3 axes rotated 0 (Axis 1), 120 (Axis 2) y 240 degrees (Axis 3) on the XZ plane



A 0 corresponds to spin up and 1 to spin down along the particular axis used for that measurement  


Measurement A <---------------------------- 2 spin 1/2 particles with total S = 0 -------------------> Measurement B



A1B1 means we measure along axis1 for particle A and axis 1 for particle B, A1B2 means we measure along axis1 for particle A and axis 2 for particle B and so on.

Assuming the spins are determined (by hidden variables) prior to the measurements, the EPR prediction would be


A             B	          Anti-Correlations		 Fraction of Anti-Correlated Measurements

123	      123	 [A1B1,A1B2,A1B3,A2B1,A2B2,A2B3,A3B1,A3B2,A3B3]			 

000 	      111 	 [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] 			 9 / 9
001 	      110 	 [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1] 			 5 / 9
010 	      101 	 [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1] 			 5 / 9
011 	      100 	 [1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1] 			 5 / 9
100 	      011 	 [1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1] 			 5 / 9
101 	      010 	 [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1] 			 5 / 9
110 	      001 	 [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1] 			 5 / 9
111 	      000 	 [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] 			 9 / 9


According to EPR the fraction of anti-correlated measurements is > 5/9 (Bell's inequality: Anti-Corr(A,B) > 56%) but the experiments produce 50% anti-correlated measurements.

Quantum Mechanics violates Bell's inequality and therefore the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument is not valid and Quantum Mechanics is a non-local theory.

References

Mermin, N.D.: Bringing home the atomic world: Quantum mysteries for anybody. American Journal of Physics 49, 940-943 (1981).

Answering Mermin’s Challenge with the Relativity Principle by Mark Stuckey https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/answering-mermins-challenge-with-wilczeks-challenge

Youtube video by Brian Greene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZiwtfrisTQ

About

We illustrate how to test the version of the Bell inequality proposed by David Mermin using Qiskit

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published