Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix cached 200 status code handling #958

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 22, 2023
Merged

Fix cached 200 status code handling #958

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 22, 2023

Conversation

mre
Copy link
Member

@mre mre commented Feb 22, 2023

Assert that code 200 never needs to be explicitly accepted for cached response
to match the behavior of uncached checks.

Immediately bumps the version to 0.11.1 for the hotfix.

See discussion in #843.

Assert that code 200 never needs to be explicitly accepted for cached response
to match the behavior of uncached checks
@MichaIng
Copy link
Member

That was quick, many thanks 👍🙂.

@MichaIng
Copy link
Member

MichaIng commented Feb 22, 2023

There are no artefacts/binaries created until release, right? Give me some minutes to compile it and test.

@mre
Copy link
Member Author

mre commented Feb 22, 2023

That's correct. Sorry for the inconvenience.

@MichaIng
Copy link
Member

Works well with this commit 👍.

@mre mre merged commit b653a0a into master Feb 22, 2023
@mre mre deleted the v0.11.1 branch February 22, 2023 23:25
@mre
Copy link
Member Author

mre commented Feb 22, 2023

Thanks for the test.

MichaIng added a commit to MichaIng/DietPi-Docs that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants