You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Also, I did a quick side-by-side comparison between 1.7.0 and 2.0.0 beta 4, both with 98% quality using jpg. It seems that 2.0.0 gives a bigger file size (13.8mb vs 12.9mb) but gives better quality, especially at the edges of in-photo objects. I think I'll switch to 2.0.0 from here on. Thanks for all your work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The algorithm powering the two versions is very different, so this kind of results is expected. You can probably lower the quality on v2.0 reducing the size of the output and the quality should be better overall.
A small issue - just thought you should know.
Also, I did a quick side-by-side comparison between 1.7.0 and 2.0.0 beta 4, both with 98% quality using jpg. It seems that 2.0.0 gives a bigger file size (13.8mb vs 12.9mb) but gives better quality, especially at the edges of in-photo objects. I think I'll switch to 2.0.0 from here on. Thanks for all your work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: