Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate integration tests #326

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Mar 9, 2021

Conversation

stephen-soltesz
Copy link
Contributor

@stephen-soltesz stephen-soltesz commented Mar 9, 2021

This change is 1 of 2 changes that migrate etl-gardener from travis to cloudbuild deployments.

This change removes support for deployments from travis and adds better integration testing support. It turned out that many files require service account credentials than were implied by the unit test file names. This change updates all files that fail without SA credentials to be part of the "integration" test builds. Future work should segregate tests into the correctly named files.


This change is Reviewable

@stephen-soltesz
Copy link
Contributor Author

stephen-soltesz commented Mar 9, 2021

NOTE: the cloud build trigger failed on the status checks b/c this branch does not yet include a cloudbuild.yaml config.
EDIT: I've added a placeholder cloudbuild.yaml to allow the status check to pass.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Mar 9, 2021

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 60.414% when pulling 5be6d7e on sandbox-soltesz-integration-testing into e82fb30 on master.

Copy link
Contributor

@robertodauria robertodauria left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 10 of 10 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 1 approvals obtained

@stephen-soltesz stephen-soltesz merged commit e3dc24d into master Mar 9, 2021
@stephen-soltesz stephen-soltesz deleted the sandbox-soltesz-integration-testing branch August 12, 2022 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants