You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 29, 2018. It is now read-only.
There are a couple of problems with using defsyntax rather thand define-package-syntax.
First, defsyntax doesn't actually define a variable with the given name, as the documentation suggests. (The documentation seems outdated, it uses :dispatch-macro-character rather than :dispatch-macro-char).
Secondly, use-syntax assumes that the name is the name of a package, and uses package-syntax-name, on the name to get the options rather than just using the name, when it is not in fact a package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tmccombs
added a commit
to tmccombs/cl-syntax
that referenced
this issue
Jul 21, 2014
There are a couple of problems with using defsyntax rather thand define-package-syntax.
First, defsyntax doesn't actually define a variable with the given name, as the documentation suggests. (The documentation seems outdated, it uses :dispatch-macro-character rather than :dispatch-macro-char).
Secondly, use-syntax assumes that the name is the name of a package, and uses package-syntax-name, on the name to get the options rather than just using the name, when it is not in fact a package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: