fix(complex): ignore traversals selector types

[rdamlenc]

complex selectors should ignore traversals selector types

So #foo .bar ul li a complixity level would be 5 rather than 9

[macbre]

Thanks for the fix.

So #foo .bar ul li a complixity level would be 5 rather than 9

Can you add a test case for that, please?

[Jieiku]

Thanks for this fix, really looking forward to it :)

[Jieiku]

@rdamlenc is this ready to merge? I noticed @macbre mentioned adding a test case?

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8064517022

Details

• 0 of 3 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 8064500565:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	555
Relevant Lines:	555

---

💛 - Coveralls

[macbre]

@rdamlenc is this ready to merge? I noticed @macbre mentioned adding a test case?

I you can provide some selectors examples (with the expected complexity,), I'll be more than happy to add the test coverage here.

[Jieiku]

In my case analyze-css is used by yellowlabtools. YellowLabTools reports complex selectors as being more than 3 selectors, but now it seems to be including selectors that were previously considered OK.

in the old version it reports as expected: https://yellowlab.tools/result/gtr25fqnyn/rule/cssComplexSelectors

but the new version being developed reports very differently: http://yellowlab.tools:8282/result/gtr26h6mbq/rule/cssComplexSelectors

You can see the list of detected selectors in the second link, but a couple from that list include:

These should be returned as 3 selectors complexity

footer nav a
main nav a
main nav span

and in more detail

  footer nav {
    a {
        margin: .2rem;
    }
    i {
      margin-bottom: .2rem;
    }
  }

  main nav {
    margin-top: var(--s2);//pagination margin
    a,span {
      margin: .2rem;
    }
  }

both are the same site: https://abridge.netlify.app/

This once merged will reportedly fix the issue: YellowLabTools/YellowLabTools#386 (comment)

[macbre]

I've rebased this PR to merge into c9d6af8 that introduces some test cases.