gdal: add +libarchive variant

[nilason]

Description

Add dependency and linking to libarchive with a new +libarchive variant and thus prevent opportunistic linking.

Closes: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/67448

Type(s)

• bugfix
• enhancement
• security fix

Tested on

macOS 12.6.5 21G531 arm64
Xcode 14.2 14C18

Verification

Have you

• followed our Commit Message Guidelines?
• squashed and minimized your commits?
• checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same change?
• referenced existing tickets on Trac with full URL?
• checked your Portfile with port lint --nitpick?
• tried existing tests with sudo port test?
• tried a full install with sudo port -vst install?
• tested basic functionality of all binary files?
• checked that the Portfile's most important variants haven't been broken?

[macportsbot]

Notifying maintainers:
@Veence for port gdal.

[mascguy]

LGTM. @Veence ?

[nilason]

LGTM. @Veence ?

Absolutely no disrespect for Veence, but considering the negative effect on quite a number of dependencies and Veence's absence lately, I think we should proceed with this PR ASAP.

[mascguy]

LGTM. @Veence ?

Absolutely no disrespect for Veence, but considering the negative effect on quite a number of dependencies and Veence's absence lately, I think we should proceed with this PR ASAP.

Agreed, I'll go ahead and merge.

[nilason]

LGTM. @Veence ?

Absolutely no disrespect for Veence, but considering the negative effect on quite a number of dependencies and Veence's absence lately, I think we should proceed with this PR ASAP.

Agreed, I'll go ahead and merge.

Great!

As @ryandesign mentioned in the trac ticket:

After that, we should force buildbot builds of all ports that depend on gdal.

How and who can manage that?

[mascguy]

Great!

As @ryandesign mentioned in the trac ticket:

After that, we should force buildbot builds of all ports that depend on gdal.

How and who can manage that?

I'll take care of that now. Thanks for the heads-up!