Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Extending type-hinting functionality of QuantamentalDataFrame to subclass pd.DataFrame #1264

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

Magnus167
Copy link
Member

Merging this PR allows syntax highlighting for pd.DataFrame functions to QuantamentalDataFrame

@Magnus167 Magnus167 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2023 18:48
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (a03b79d) 83.78% compared to head (0311089) 83.77%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head 0311089 differs from pull request most recent head d7e5007. Consider uploading reports for the commit d7e5007 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1264      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    83.78%   83.77%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files           59       59              
  Lines         6056     6058       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits          5074     5075       +1     
- Misses         982      983       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
.../management/simulate/simulate_quantamental_data.py 94.96% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
macrosynergy/management/types.py 97.22% <83.33%> (-2.78%) ⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

@Magnus167 Magnus167 merged commit b14b100 into develop Feb 7, 2024
5 checks passed
@Magnus167 Magnus167 deleted the feature/extending_qdf_ext branch February 7, 2024 11:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants