Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Sign- and time-weighted regression models #1365

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024

Conversation

rushilg99
Copy link
Contributor

@rushilg99 rushilg99 commented Jan 4, 2024

No description provided.

@rushilg99 rushilg99 marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2024 16:33
@rushilg99 rushilg99 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 4, 2024 16:33
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5445a2b) 81.30% compared to head (97b7727) 81.44%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1365      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    81.30%   81.44%   +0.14%     
===========================================
  Files           62       62              
  Lines         5797     5907     +110     
===========================================
+ Hits          4713     4811      +98     
- Misses        1084     1096      +12     
Files Coverage Δ
macrosynergy/learning/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
macrosynergy/learning/predictors.py 88.03% <89.09%> (+16.60%) ⬆️

Impacted file tree graph

@rushilg99 rushilg99 merged commit 8214080 into develop Jan 11, 2024
7 checks passed
@rushilg99 rushilg99 deleted the feature/weightedregressors branch January 11, 2024 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants