Add sources online

[koilebeit]

Pull Request

Add Sources Online in src/lib/data/entries.json.

Short pitch

Closes #89

Checklist

Please ensure that you have completed the following tasks:

• I have read and understood the contribution guidelines.
• I have run npm run prepare to sort the entries in src/lib/data/entries.json alphabetically and to generate the README.md file.
• I have run npm run format to format the repository code.
• I have run npm run awesome-lint to ensure that the README.md file is formatted correctly.

Criteria for accepting a pull request

Contributors, please ensure that:

• A short pitch is included in the pull request description.
• The addition you proposed is NOT part of everything that did not make it into the list.

Maintainers, please ensure that:

• The above criteria are followed.
• The tests pass on the CI.
• In the case of addition or removal, make an assessment of the awesomeness of the entry.

Updating your PR

If the maintainers notice anything that needs to be changed, they will ask you to edit your PR before merging it. Please do not open a new PR, just edit the existing one. If you're not sure how to do that, here is a guide on the different ways you can update your PR.

Appendix: running lint tests

To run tests locally using Node.js, you need to install the dependencies first:

npm install
npm run prepare

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated README to include "Sources Online" as a new platform providing access to digital scholarly text editions in Switzerland.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update involves adding "Sources Online" to the list of platforms that provide access to digital scholarly text editions in Switzerland. This new source enhances the collection with its integration of TEI Publisher and IIIF, offering a significant resource for digital humanities research.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Added "Sources Online" to the digital text editions platforms list

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Add "Sources Online" to platforms list (#89)	✅
Include details about "Sources Online" (#89)	✅
Justify the addition of "Sources Online" (#89)	✅

🐇✨
In the land of code and lore,
A new source springs, with knowledge galore.
"Sources Online," where texts unite,
Under Switzerland's sky, a digital light.
Through TEI and IIIF's might,
A rabbit hops in sheer delight.
📚🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ecc3a8 and 8c3936e.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• src/lib/data/entries.json is excluded by: !**/*.json

Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 2

README.md (2)

• 161-161: The addition of "Sources Online" to the Switzerland section enriches the collection with a valuable resource for digital scholarly text editions. This entry is well-placed within the list, maintaining the alphabetical order and thematic consistency of the section.
• 158-164: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [190-190]

Consider using consistent spelling for words like "flavours" and "flavors" throughout the document to maintain consistency, especially if the document targets an international audience. This is a minor issue but can enhance the readability and professionalism of the document.